The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.

Q1 Medicine
GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2015-11-12 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000224
Stefanie C Hautz, Wolf E Hautz, Niklas Keller, Markus A Feufel, Claudia Spies
{"title":"The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.","authors":"Stefanie C Hautz, Wolf E Hautz, Niklas Keller, Markus A Feufel, Claudia Spies","doi":"10.3205/000224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, a national competence based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM) was developed by the Society for Medical Education and the Council of Medical Faculties. As many of its international counterparts the NKLM describes the qualifications of medical school graduates. The definition of such outcome frameworks indents to make medical education transparent to students, teachers and society. The NKLM aims to amend existing lists of medical topics for assessment with learnable competencies. All outcome frameworks are structured into chapters, domains or physician roles. The definition of the scholar-role poses a number of questions such as: What distinguishes necessary qualifications of a scientifically qualified physician from those of a medical scientist?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>13 outcome frameworks were identified through a systematic three-step literature review and their content compared to the scholar role in the NKLM by means of a qualitative text analysis. The three steps consist of (1) search for outcome frameworks, (2) in- and exclusion, and (3) data extraction, categorization, and validation. The results were afterwards matched with the scholar role of the NKLM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extracted contents of all frameworks may be summarized into the components Common Basics, Clinical Application, Research, Teaching and Education, and Lifelong Learning. Compared to the included frameworks the NKLM emphasises competencies necessary for research and teaching while clinical application is less prominently mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scholar role of the NKLM differs from other international outcome frameworks. Discussing these results shall increase propagation and understanding of the NKLM and thus contribute to the qualification of future medical graduates in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"Doc20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4645747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Germany, a national competence based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM) was developed by the Society for Medical Education and the Council of Medical Faculties. As many of its international counterparts the NKLM describes the qualifications of medical school graduates. The definition of such outcome frameworks indents to make medical education transparent to students, teachers and society. The NKLM aims to amend existing lists of medical topics for assessment with learnable competencies. All outcome frameworks are structured into chapters, domains or physician roles. The definition of the scholar-role poses a number of questions such as: What distinguishes necessary qualifications of a scientifically qualified physician from those of a medical scientist?

Methods: 13 outcome frameworks were identified through a systematic three-step literature review and their content compared to the scholar role in the NKLM by means of a qualitative text analysis. The three steps consist of (1) search for outcome frameworks, (2) in- and exclusion, and (3) data extraction, categorization, and validation. The results were afterwards matched with the scholar role of the NKLM.

Results: Extracted contents of all frameworks may be summarized into the components Common Basics, Clinical Application, Research, Teaching and Education, and Lifelong Learning. Compared to the included frameworks the NKLM emphasises competencies necessary for research and teaching while clinical application is less prominently mentioned.

Conclusion: The scholar role of the NKLM differs from other international outcome frameworks. Discussing these results shall increase propagation and understanding of the NKLM and thus contribute to the qualification of future medical graduates in Germany.

与其他国际框架相比,学者在基于能力的国家医学本科教育学习目标目录(NKLM)中的作用。
背景:在德国,医学教育协会和医学院理事会制定了以能力为基础的国家医学学习目标目录(NKLM)。与许多国际同行一样,NKLM 描述了医学院毕业生的资质。这种成果框架的定义旨在使医学教育对学生、教师和社会透明。NKLM 的目的是用可学习的能力来修正现有的医学评估主题清单。所有成果框架都按章节、领域或医生角色划分。学者角色的定义提出了一系列问题,例如:什么是学者角色的必要资质?方法:通过系统的三步文献综述确定了 13 个成果框架,并通过定性文本分析将其内容与 NKLM 中的学者角色进行了比较。这三个步骤包括:(1)搜索成果框架;(2)纳入和排除;(3)数据提取、分类和验证。然后将结果与 NKLM 的学者角色进行匹配:结果:从所有框架中提取的内容可归纳为共同基础、临床应用、研究、教学和终身学习等部分。与所包括的框架相比,NKLM 强调研究和教学所需的能力,而临床应用则较少提及:结论:NKLM 的学者角色与其他国际成果框架不同。对这些结果的讨论将加强对 NKLM 的宣传和理解,从而为德国未来医学毕业生的资格认证做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信