J. Sánchez-Rosas, M. Dyzenchauz, S. Dominguez-Lara
{"title":"Validez de contenido de la Escala de Autoeficacia Colectiva Docente","authors":"J. Sánchez-Rosas, M. Dyzenchauz, S. Dominguez-Lara","doi":"10.32348/1852.4206.V13.N1.28132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa autoeficacia colectiva docente, entendida como las percepciones compartidas de los docentes de una escuela de que, en conjunto, podran organizar y ejecutar las acciones necesarias para ejercer un efecto positivo en los estudiantes, se relaciono con diferentes variables asociadas a la educacion. A pesar de la importancia que adquirio en los ultimos anos, los instrumentos creados para medirla presentan limitaciones. Por eso, el presente trabajo se propone desarrollar un instrumento para evaluarla y obtener evidencias de validez de contenido. Para ello, se redactaron los items junto con docentes e investigadores, de acuerdo a las seis dimensiones de la autoeficacia docente propuestas por Bandura (2006). Luego se elaboro una prueba de juicio de expertos con una muestra de docentes y otra con una muestra de investigadores. Los items demostraron ser validos en cuanto a su pertinencia y claridad, aunque se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las valoraciones de ambas muestras. EnglishCollective teacher self-efficacy, understood as the shared perceptions of the teachers of a school that, together, they will be able to organize and execute the necessary actions to produce a positive effect on the students, was related to different variables associated to education. Despite the importance it has acquired in recent years, the instruments created to measure it have limitations. For this reason, the present work sets out to develop an instrument to evaluate it and obtain evidence of content validity. To do this, the items were written together with teachers and researchers, according to the six dimensions of teacher self-efficacy proposed by Bandura (2006). Then, an expert judgment test was prepared with a sample of teachers and another one with a sample of researchers. The items proved to be valid in terms of their relevance and clarity, although significant differences were found between the evaluations of both samples.","PeriodicalId":53986,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","volume":"13 1","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.V13.N1.28132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
espanolLa autoeficacia colectiva docente, entendida como las percepciones compartidas de los docentes de una escuela de que, en conjunto, podran organizar y ejecutar las acciones necesarias para ejercer un efecto positivo en los estudiantes, se relaciono con diferentes variables asociadas a la educacion. A pesar de la importancia que adquirio en los ultimos anos, los instrumentos creados para medirla presentan limitaciones. Por eso, el presente trabajo se propone desarrollar un instrumento para evaluarla y obtener evidencias de validez de contenido. Para ello, se redactaron los items junto con docentes e investigadores, de acuerdo a las seis dimensiones de la autoeficacia docente propuestas por Bandura (2006). Luego se elaboro una prueba de juicio de expertos con una muestra de docentes y otra con una muestra de investigadores. Los items demostraron ser validos en cuanto a su pertinencia y claridad, aunque se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las valoraciones de ambas muestras. EnglishCollective teacher self-efficacy, understood as the shared perceptions of the teachers of a school that, together, they will be able to organize and execute the necessary actions to produce a positive effect on the students, was related to different variables associated to education. Despite the importance it has acquired in recent years, the instruments created to measure it have limitations. For this reason, the present work sets out to develop an instrument to evaluate it and obtain evidence of content validity. To do this, the items were written together with teachers and researchers, according to the six dimensions of teacher self-efficacy proposed by Bandura (2006). Then, an expert judgment test was prepared with a sample of teachers and another one with a sample of researchers. The items proved to be valid in terms of their relevance and clarity, although significant differences were found between the evaluations of both samples.