The importance of evidence-based practice

S. Buckley
{"title":"The importance of evidence-based practice","authors":"S. Buckley","doi":"10.3104/EDITORIALS.2032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This editorial discusses the ways in which evidence-based practice should be developed and evaluated, from first hypotheses to gold standard ‘blind’ randomised control trials but also acknowledges that parents, educators and therapists usually have to make decisions on how to best help children with Down syndrome in the absence of this evidence. Guidance is offered on the ways in which new therapies can be evaluated, arguing strongly for objective evaluations and the avoidance of unproven and scientifically implausible approaches.","PeriodicalId":80275,"journal":{"name":"Down's syndrome, research and practice : the journal of the Sarah Duffen Centre","volume":"12 1","pages":"165-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Down's syndrome, research and practice : the journal of the Sarah Duffen Centre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3104/EDITORIALS.2032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This editorial discusses the ways in which evidence-based practice should be developed and evaluated, from first hypotheses to gold standard ‘blind’ randomised control trials but also acknowledges that parents, educators and therapists usually have to make decisions on how to best help children with Down syndrome in the absence of this evidence. Guidance is offered on the ways in which new therapies can be evaluated, arguing strongly for objective evaluations and the avoidance of unproven and scientifically implausible approaches.
循证实践的重要性
这篇社论讨论了基于证据的实践应该如何发展和评估,从最初的假设到黄金标准的“盲”随机对照试验,但也承认,在缺乏证据的情况下,父母、教育工作者和治疗师通常必须就如何最好地帮助唐氏综合症儿童做出决定。指南提供了评估新疗法的方法,强烈主张进行客观评估,避免采用未经证实和科学上不合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信