Use of everyday technology to promote ambulation in people with intellectual and multiple disabilities

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
G. Lancioni, Nirbhay N. Singh, M. O'Reilly, J. Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Valeria Chiariello, L. Desideri
{"title":"Use of everyday technology to promote ambulation in people with intellectual and multiple disabilities","authors":"G. Lancioni, Nirbhay N. Singh, M. O'Reilly, J. Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Valeria Chiariello, L. Desideri","doi":"10.3233/tad-210336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: People with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and visual or motor impairment tend to be detached and sedentary. OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed a technology-aided intervention to promote ambulation in four people with severe to profound intellectual disability combined with blindness or deafness and spasticity. METHOD: The intervention was introduced according to a non-concurrent multiple baseline design across participants. The participants wore a smartphone fitted with the MacroDroid application at their right or left ankle. This application served to (a) detect and record smartphone’s shake events (i.e., events related to the step responses the participant performed with the leg to which the smartphone was fixed) throughout the study, and (b) automatically deliver stimulation and encouragements/prompts (i.e., in relation to step responses and lack of responding, respectively) during the intervention. RESULTS: Data showed that during the baseline (i.e., prior to the intervention) the participants’ mean frequency of step responses were between 26 and 61 per 5-min session. During the intervention the mean session frequency increased to between 100 and 157. The increase was statistically significant for all participants. CONCLUSION: The aforementioned technology-aided intervention may be a useful tool for promoting ambulation in people like those involved in this study.","PeriodicalId":22201,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Disability","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/tad-210336","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-210336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with severe to profound intellectual disabilities and visual or motor impairment tend to be detached and sedentary. OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed a technology-aided intervention to promote ambulation in four people with severe to profound intellectual disability combined with blindness or deafness and spasticity. METHOD: The intervention was introduced according to a non-concurrent multiple baseline design across participants. The participants wore a smartphone fitted with the MacroDroid application at their right or left ankle. This application served to (a) detect and record smartphone’s shake events (i.e., events related to the step responses the participant performed with the leg to which the smartphone was fixed) throughout the study, and (b) automatically deliver stimulation and encouragements/prompts (i.e., in relation to step responses and lack of responding, respectively) during the intervention. RESULTS: Data showed that during the baseline (i.e., prior to the intervention) the participants’ mean frequency of step responses were between 26 and 61 per 5-min session. During the intervention the mean session frequency increased to between 100 and 157. The increase was statistically significant for all participants. CONCLUSION: The aforementioned technology-aided intervention may be a useful tool for promoting ambulation in people like those involved in this study.
使用日常技术促进智力残疾和多重残疾人士行走
背景:患有严重到深度智力障碍和视觉或运动障碍的人倾向于脱离和久坐。目的:本研究评估了一种技术辅助干预,以促进4名重度至重度智力残疾合并失明或耳聋和痉挛患者的行走。方法:干预措施采用非并发多基线设计。参与者在他们的右脚踝或左脚踝上佩戴装有MacroDroid应用程序的智能手机。该应用程序用于(a)在整个研究过程中检测和记录智能手机的震动事件(即,与参与者用智能手机固定的腿进行的步骤响应相关的事件),以及(b)在干预期间自动提供刺激和鼓励/提示(即,分别与步骤响应和缺乏响应相关)。结果:数据显示,在基线期间(即干预之前),参与者的平均步幅反应频率为每5分钟26至61次。在干预期间,平均会话频率增加到100到157之间。对所有参与者来说,这一增长在统计学上都是显著的。结论:上述技术辅助干预可能是促进像本研究中所涉及的人行走的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Disability
Technology and Disability Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Technology and Disability communicates knowledge about the field of assistive technology devices and services, within the context of the lives of end users - persons with disabilities and their family members. While the topics are technical in nature, the articles are written for broad comprehension despite the reader"s education or training. Technology and Disability"s contents cover research and development efforts, education and training programs, service and policy activities and consumer experiences. - The term Technology refers to assistive devices and services. - The term Disability refers to both permanent and temporary functional limitations experienced by people of any age within any circumstance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信