[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty].

L. Hilborne, L. Leape, J. Kahan, R. Park, C. Kamberg, R. Brook
{"title":"[Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty].","authors":"L. Hilborne, L. Leape, J. Kahan, R. Park, C. Kamberg, R. Brook","doi":"10.3348/JKRS.1986.22.2.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although coronary stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, and insulin infusion appear to reduce morbidity in diabetic patients undergoing revascularization, long-term outcomes remain poorer for diabetic patients than for non-diabetic patients. Among patients with diabetes, insulin treatment is a consistent marker of worse outcomes. Randomized controlled trial results show that diabetic patients with multivessel disease have improved long-term survival with initial coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) treatment compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, an effect not seen in non-diabetic patients. The advantage with CABG is apparent earlier in insulin-treated patients. This benefit with CABG may be related to a protective effect following myocardial infarction, as prior CABG greatly reduced the risk of death following spontaneous Q-wave myocardial infarction in diabetic patients (relative risk 0.09) but not in non-diabetic patients. Overall, however, the high incidence of cardiac events and poorer long-term outcomes in diabetic patients after revascularization underscore the palliative nature of these procedures in this population and the need to treat risk factors aggressively. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 2000, 7:184–190 © 2000","PeriodicalId":76828,"journal":{"name":"Xianggang hu li za zhi. The Hong Kong nursing journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3348/JKRS.1986.22.2.180","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Xianggang hu li za zhi. The Hong Kong nursing journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/JKRS.1986.22.2.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although coronary stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, and insulin infusion appear to reduce morbidity in diabetic patients undergoing revascularization, long-term outcomes remain poorer for diabetic patients than for non-diabetic patients. Among patients with diabetes, insulin treatment is a consistent marker of worse outcomes. Randomized controlled trial results show that diabetic patients with multivessel disease have improved long-term survival with initial coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) treatment compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, an effect not seen in non-diabetic patients. The advantage with CABG is apparent earlier in insulin-treated patients. This benefit with CABG may be related to a protective effect following myocardial infarction, as prior CABG greatly reduced the risk of death following spontaneous Q-wave myocardial infarction in diabetic patients (relative risk 0.09) but not in non-diabetic patients. Overall, however, the high incidence of cardiac events and poorer long-term outcomes in diabetic patients after revascularization underscore the palliative nature of these procedures in this population and the need to treat risk factors aggressively. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 2000, 7:184–190 © 2000
经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术。
尽管冠状动脉支架、糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂和胰岛素输注似乎可以降低接受血运重建术的糖尿病患者的发病率,但糖尿病患者的长期预后仍然比非糖尿病患者差。在糖尿病患者中,胰岛素治疗是预后较差的一致标志。随机对照试验结果显示,与经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术相比,合并多血管疾病的糖尿病患者接受初始冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)治疗可改善长期生存率,这一效果在非糖尿病患者中未见。在接受胰岛素治疗的患者中,冠脉搭桥的优势更早显现。CABG的这种益处可能与心肌梗死后的保护作用有关,因为先前的CABG大大降低了糖尿病患者自发性q波心肌梗死后的死亡风险(相对风险0.09),而非糖尿病患者则没有。然而,总的来说,糖尿病患者血运重建术后心脏事件的高发生率和较差的长期预后强调了这些手术在这一人群中的姑息性,以及积极治疗危险因素的必要性。内分泌与糖尿病杂志,2000,(7):184 - 190©2000
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信