A workplace-based intervention to increase levels of daily physical activity: the Travel to Work cluster RCT

S. Audrey, H. Fisher, A. Cooper, D. Gaunt, C. Metcalfe, K. Garfield, W. Hollingworth, S. Procter, Marie Gabe-Walters, S. Rodgers, F. Gillison, A. Davis, P. Insall
{"title":"A workplace-based intervention to increase levels of daily physical activity: the Travel to Work cluster RCT","authors":"S. Audrey, H. Fisher, A. Cooper, D. Gaunt, C. Metcalfe, K. Garfield, W. Hollingworth, S. Procter, Marie Gabe-Walters, S. Rodgers, F. Gillison, A. Davis, P. Insall","doi":"10.3310/PHR07110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There may be opportunities for working adults to accumulate recommended physical activity levels (≥ 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity in bouts of ≥ 10 minutes throughout the week) during the commute to work. Systematic reviews of interventions to increase active transport indicate that studies are predominantly of poor quality, rely on self-report and lack robust statistical analyses.\n \n \n \n To assess the effectiveness, cost and consequences of a behavioural intervention to increase walking during the commute to work.\n \n \n \n A multicentre, parallel-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial incorporating economic and process evaluations. Physical activity outcomes were measured using accelerometers and GPS (Global Positioning System) receivers at baseline and the 12-month follow-up.\n \n \n \n Workplaces in seven urban areas in south-west England and south Wales.\n \n \n \n Employees (n = 654) in 87 workplaces.\n \n \n \n Workplace-based Walk to Work promoters were trained to implement a 10-week intervention incorporating key behaviour change techniques.\n \n \n \n The primary outcome was the daily number of minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Secondary outcomes included MVPA during the commute, overall levels of physical activity and modal shift (from private car to walking). Cost–consequences analysis included employer, employee and health service costs and consequences. Process outcomes included barriers to, and facilitators of, walking during the daily commute.\n \n \n \n There was no evidence of an intervention effect on MVPA at the 12-month follow-up [adjusted difference in means 0.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) –5.3 to 5.9 minutes]. The intervention cost was on average, £181.97 per workplace and £24.19 per participating employee. In comparison with car users [mean 7.3 minutes, standard deviation (SD) 7.6 minutes], walkers (mean 34.3 minutes, SD 18.6 minutes) and public transport users (mean 25.7 minutes, SD 14.0 minutes) accrued substantially higher levels of daily MVPA during the commute. Participants who walked for ≥ 10 minutes during their commute were more likely to have a shorter commute distance (p < 0.001). No access to a car (p < 0.001) and absence of free workplace car parking (p < 0.01) were independently related to walking to work and using public transport. Higher quality-of-life scores were observed for the intervention group in a repeated-measures analysis (mean 0.018, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.036; scores anchored at 0 indicated ‘no capability’ and scores anchored at 1 indicated ‘full capability’).\n \n \n \n Although this research showed that walking to work and using public transport are important contributors to physical activity levels in a working population, the behavioural intervention was insufficient to change travel behaviour. Broader contextual factors, such as length of journey, commuting options and availability of car parking, may influence the effectiveness of behavioural interventions to change travel behaviour. Further analyses of statistical and qualitative data could focus on physical activity and travel mode and the wider determinants of workplace travel behaviour.\n \n \n \n Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15009100.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Living Streets, a UK charity promoting everyday walking, provided funding for the intervention booklets and free pedometers for distribution to participants in the intervention group.","PeriodicalId":32306,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/PHR07110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

There may be opportunities for working adults to accumulate recommended physical activity levels (≥ 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity in bouts of ≥ 10 minutes throughout the week) during the commute to work. Systematic reviews of interventions to increase active transport indicate that studies are predominantly of poor quality, rely on self-report and lack robust statistical analyses. To assess the effectiveness, cost and consequences of a behavioural intervention to increase walking during the commute to work. A multicentre, parallel-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial incorporating economic and process evaluations. Physical activity outcomes were measured using accelerometers and GPS (Global Positioning System) receivers at baseline and the 12-month follow-up. Workplaces in seven urban areas in south-west England and south Wales. Employees (n = 654) in 87 workplaces. Workplace-based Walk to Work promoters were trained to implement a 10-week intervention incorporating key behaviour change techniques. The primary outcome was the daily number of minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Secondary outcomes included MVPA during the commute, overall levels of physical activity and modal shift (from private car to walking). Cost–consequences analysis included employer, employee and health service costs and consequences. Process outcomes included barriers to, and facilitators of, walking during the daily commute. There was no evidence of an intervention effect on MVPA at the 12-month follow-up [adjusted difference in means 0.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) –5.3 to 5.9 minutes]. The intervention cost was on average, £181.97 per workplace and £24.19 per participating employee. In comparison with car users [mean 7.3 minutes, standard deviation (SD) 7.6 minutes], walkers (mean 34.3 minutes, SD 18.6 minutes) and public transport users (mean 25.7 minutes, SD 14.0 minutes) accrued substantially higher levels of daily MVPA during the commute. Participants who walked for ≥ 10 minutes during their commute were more likely to have a shorter commute distance (p < 0.001). No access to a car (p < 0.001) and absence of free workplace car parking (p < 0.01) were independently related to walking to work and using public transport. Higher quality-of-life scores were observed for the intervention group in a repeated-measures analysis (mean 0.018, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.036; scores anchored at 0 indicated ‘no capability’ and scores anchored at 1 indicated ‘full capability’). Although this research showed that walking to work and using public transport are important contributors to physical activity levels in a working population, the behavioural intervention was insufficient to change travel behaviour. Broader contextual factors, such as length of journey, commuting options and availability of car parking, may influence the effectiveness of behavioural interventions to change travel behaviour. Further analyses of statistical and qualitative data could focus on physical activity and travel mode and the wider determinants of workplace travel behaviour. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15009100. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Living Streets, a UK charity promoting everyday walking, provided funding for the intervention booklets and free pedometers for distribution to participants in the intervention group.
以工作场所为基础的提高日常身体活动水平的干预措施:上班出行集群随机对照试验
上班族可能有机会在上下班途中积累推荐的体力活动水平(每周≥10分钟,每次≥150分钟的中等强度体力活动)。对增加主动交通的干预措施的系统回顾表明,这些研究主要质量较差,依赖于自我报告,缺乏可靠的统计分析。评估行为干预增加上下班步行的有效性、成本和后果。一项多中心、平行分组、随机对照试验,纳入经济和工艺评估。在基线和12个月的随访中,使用加速度计和GPS(全球定位系统)接收器测量身体活动结果。英格兰西南部和南威尔士七个城市的工作场所。87个工作场所的员工(n = 654)。以工作场所为基础的步行上班促进者接受了培训,以实施一项为期10周的干预措施,其中包括关键的行为改变技术。研究的主要结果是每天进行中度到剧烈身体活动的分钟数(MVPA)。次要结果包括通勤期间的MVPA,整体身体活动水平和模式转变(从私家车到步行)。成本-后果分析包括雇主、雇员和保健服务的成本和后果。过程结果包括在日常通勤中行走的障碍和促进者。在12个月的随访中,没有证据表明干预对MVPA有影响[调整后的平均差异为0.3分钟,95%可信区间(CI) -5.3至5.9分钟]。干预成本平均为每个工作场所181.97英镑,每个参与员工24.19英镑。与汽车使用者(平均7.3分钟,标准差7.6分钟)相比,步行者(平均34.3分钟,标准差18.6分钟)和公共交通使用者(平均25.7分钟,标准差14.0分钟)在通勤期间累积的每日MVPA水平要高得多。在通勤期间步行≥10分钟的参与者更有可能缩短通勤距离(p < 0.001)。没有汽车(p < 0.001)和没有免费的工作场所停车场(p < 0.01)与步行上班和使用公共交通工具独立相关。在重复测量分析中,观察到干预组的生活质量得分较高(平均0.018,95% CI 0.000至0.036;分数锚定在0表示“没有能力”,分数锚定在1表示“完全有能力”)。尽管这项研究表明,步行上班和使用公共交通工具对工作人群的身体活动水平有重要影响,但行为干预不足以改变出行行为。更广泛的背景因素,如旅程长度、通勤选择和停车场的可用性,可能会影响改变出行行为的行为干预措施的有效性。对统计和定性数据的进一步分析可侧重于体力活动和旅行方式以及工作场所旅行行为的更广泛决定因素。当前对照试验ISRCTN15009100。该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究方案资助,将全文发表在《公共卫生研究》上;第七卷,第11期请参阅NIHR期刊图书馆网站了解更多项目信息。英国慈善机构“生活街道”(Living Streets)提倡每天步行,该机构为干预手册和免费计步器提供资金,分发给干预组的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信