The Relaxation Response Resiliency Enhancement Program in the Management of Chronic Refractory Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: Results from a Pilot Study

A. Vranceanu, J. Shaefer, A. Saadi, E. Slawsby, J. Sarin, M. Scult, H. Benson, J. Denninger
{"title":"The Relaxation Response Resiliency Enhancement Program in the Management of Chronic Refractory Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: Results from a Pilot Study","authors":"A. Vranceanu, J. Shaefer, A. Saadi, E. Slawsby, J. Sarin, M. Scult, H. Benson, J. Denninger","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2013.827289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: This is an open-pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a pain-specific version of an established mind–body medicine program, the Relaxation Response [RR] Resiliency Program [R3P], in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder [TMD]. Methods: Male and female with at least a six-month history of pain involving the masticatory muscles were sought in the Orofacial Pain Centers of the Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH] or through an advertisement sent to MGH employees from 2008 to 2010. Eligible participants underwent the R3P intervention [eight group sessions] after standard medical management. Pre- and post-group patients underwent objective measures of impairment [vertical and lateral range of motion with and without pain, temporomandibular joint and muscle pain palpation, and algometer measures] and completed psychosocial measures [Symptom Severity Index, Perceived Stress Scale, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Short Form 36 Health Survey]. Results: Twenty-four subjects [16 females, 90% from MGH Orofacial Pain Centers,10% from among MGH employees], mean age 38 years, met eligibility criteria and participated in the study. The intervention was highly feasible and accepted by patients, as evidenced by a 92% rate of completion. Paired t-test analyses revealed improvement on self-reported pain measures: pain intensity [p < 0.02], pain frequency [p < 0.002], pain duration [p < 0.027], pain tolerability [p < 0.009] and on several objective tests. Conclusions: The pain specific R3P is efficacious in reducing objective and subjective symptoms in patients with chronic refractory TMD. The comprehensive intervention, which combines educational information about pain with RR, cognitive behavioral and resiliency-enhancement skills, is accepted by patients and may be more efficacious than other treatments with fewer elements.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"21 1","pages":"224 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2013.827289","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2013.827289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: This is an open-pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a pain-specific version of an established mind–body medicine program, the Relaxation Response [RR] Resiliency Program [R3P], in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder [TMD]. Methods: Male and female with at least a six-month history of pain involving the masticatory muscles were sought in the Orofacial Pain Centers of the Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH] or through an advertisement sent to MGH employees from 2008 to 2010. Eligible participants underwent the R3P intervention [eight group sessions] after standard medical management. Pre- and post-group patients underwent objective measures of impairment [vertical and lateral range of motion with and without pain, temporomandibular joint and muscle pain palpation, and algometer measures] and completed psychosocial measures [Symptom Severity Index, Perceived Stress Scale, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Short Form 36 Health Survey]. Results: Twenty-four subjects [16 females, 90% from MGH Orofacial Pain Centers,10% from among MGH employees], mean age 38 years, met eligibility criteria and participated in the study. The intervention was highly feasible and accepted by patients, as evidenced by a 92% rate of completion. Paired t-test analyses revealed improvement on self-reported pain measures: pain intensity [p < 0.02], pain frequency [p < 0.002], pain duration [p < 0.027], pain tolerability [p < 0.009] and on several objective tests. Conclusions: The pain specific R3P is efficacious in reducing objective and subjective symptoms in patients with chronic refractory TMD. The comprehensive intervention, which combines educational information about pain with RR, cognitive behavioral and resiliency-enhancement skills, is accepted by patients and may be more efficacious than other treatments with fewer elements.
慢性难治性颞下颌关节紊乱的松弛反应弹性增强方案:一项初步研究的结果
目的:本研究是一项开放的先导研究,旨在评估一种已建立的身心医学项目——放松反应(RR)弹性计划(R3P)——在慢性颞下颌疾病(TMD)患者中疼痛特异性版本的可行性、可接受性和疗效。方法:从2008年到2010年,在马萨诸塞州总医院(MGH)的口腔面部疼痛中心或通过向MGH员工发出的广告寻找至少有六个月咀嚼肌疼痛史的男性和女性。符合条件的参与者在标准医疗管理后接受R3P干预[8组疗程]。组前和组后的患者接受客观的损伤测量[有疼痛和无疼痛的垂直和横向运动范围,颞下颌关节和肌肉疼痛触诊和疼痛测量],并完成心理社会测量[症状严重程度指数,感知压力量表,症状检查表-90-修订版和健康调查简表36]。结果:24名受试者[16名女性,90%来自MGH口腔面部疼痛中心,10%来自MGH员工],平均年龄38岁,符合入选标准并参加了研究。干预是高度可行的,并被患者接受,92%的完成率证明。配对t检验分析显示自我报告疼痛测量的改善:疼痛强度[p < 0.02],疼痛频率[p < 0.002],疼痛持续时间[p < 0.027],疼痛耐受性[p < 0.009]和几个客观测试。结论:疼痛特异性R3P可有效减轻慢性难治性TMD患者的客观和主观症状。综合干预将疼痛教育信息与RR、认知行为和恢复能力增强技能相结合,被患者接受,可能比其他元素较少的治疗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信