Other Soft Tissue Pain Conditions

T. Romano
{"title":"Other Soft Tissue Pain Conditions","authors":"T. Romano","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2013.824531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was a retrospective review of X-rays of a single surgeon’s patients with insertional Achilles tendinitis from 2005 to 2008. The study population consisted of 44 patients [48 heels]. There were 22 males and 22 females. They all had insertional Achilles tendinitis. They had a mean range of 52 years. The control population consisted of 50 patients [25 males, 25 females] and 50 heels without insertional Achilles tendinitis. The mean age of the control group was 55.6 years. Two measures of the Haglund’s deformity were made in the study. A standing lateral foot or ankle radiograph was analyzed for each patient and measurements were made. Haglund’s deformity height and peak angle, Buhler’s angle, Fowler–Phillip angle, and parallel pitch sign were measured. The office also looked for presence of calcifications in the study group and the length and width of the calcifications. Unpaired t-tests were used to analyze the measurements between the groups. In order to check the reliability of the measuring techniques, 10 patients’ radiographs were remeasured and correlation coefficients were obtained. In the group which had Achilles tendinitis, the mean Haglund’s deformity height was 96 mm and the mean Haglund’s deformity peak angle was 105 degrees. Calcification was present in 35 of 48 of the patients, [73%] with a mean length of 13.3 mm and a mean width of 4.5 mm. In the control group, the mean Haglund’s deformity height was 9.0 mm and the peak angle was 105 degrees. Buhler’s angle and Fowler–Phillip angle were also similar between the groups and the positive parallel pitch sign was more prevalent in the control group [60 versus 42%]. None of the differences in measurements between the two groups achieved statistical significance. The authors concluded that Haglund’s deformity was not indicative of insertional Achilles tendinitis and was actually present in asymptomatic patients. The further concluded that removing the Haglund’s deformity may not be necessary in the operative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinitis.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"21 1","pages":"295 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2013.824531","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2013.824531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was a retrospective review of X-rays of a single surgeon’s patients with insertional Achilles tendinitis from 2005 to 2008. The study population consisted of 44 patients [48 heels]. There were 22 males and 22 females. They all had insertional Achilles tendinitis. They had a mean range of 52 years. The control population consisted of 50 patients [25 males, 25 females] and 50 heels without insertional Achilles tendinitis. The mean age of the control group was 55.6 years. Two measures of the Haglund’s deformity were made in the study. A standing lateral foot or ankle radiograph was analyzed for each patient and measurements were made. Haglund’s deformity height and peak angle, Buhler’s angle, Fowler–Phillip angle, and parallel pitch sign were measured. The office also looked for presence of calcifications in the study group and the length and width of the calcifications. Unpaired t-tests were used to analyze the measurements between the groups. In order to check the reliability of the measuring techniques, 10 patients’ radiographs were remeasured and correlation coefficients were obtained. In the group which had Achilles tendinitis, the mean Haglund’s deformity height was 96 mm and the mean Haglund’s deformity peak angle was 105 degrees. Calcification was present in 35 of 48 of the patients, [73%] with a mean length of 13.3 mm and a mean width of 4.5 mm. In the control group, the mean Haglund’s deformity height was 9.0 mm and the peak angle was 105 degrees. Buhler’s angle and Fowler–Phillip angle were also similar between the groups and the positive parallel pitch sign was more prevalent in the control group [60 versus 42%]. None of the differences in measurements between the two groups achieved statistical significance. The authors concluded that Haglund’s deformity was not indicative of insertional Achilles tendinitis and was actually present in asymptomatic patients. The further concluded that removing the Haglund’s deformity may not be necessary in the operative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinitis.
其他软组织疼痛状况
本研究回顾性回顾了2005年至2008年一位外科医生治疗的插入性跟腱炎患者的x光片。研究人群包括44名患者[48个鞋跟]。男性22名,女性22名。他们都患有插入性跟腱炎。他们的平均寿命为52年。对照组包括50例患者(男25例,女25例)和50例无插入性跟腱炎的高跟鞋。对照组的平均年龄为55.6岁。研究中对海格伦氏畸形进行了两种测量。分析每位患者的站立侧足或踝关节x线片并进行测量。测量Haglund畸形高度、峰角、Buhler角、Fowler-Phillip角、平行俯仰符号。该办公室还研究了研究组中钙化的存在以及钙化的长度和宽度。非配对t检验用于分析组间测量值。为了检验测量技术的可靠性,我们重新测量了10例患者的x线片并获得相关系数。跟腱炎组平均Haglund畸形高度为96 mm,平均Haglund畸形峰角为105°。48例患者中有35例(73%)出现钙化,平均长度为13.3 mm,平均宽度为4.5 mm。对照组Haglund 's畸形平均高度为9.0 mm,峰值角度为105°。Buhler 's角和Fowler-Phillip角在两组之间也很相似,而正平行俯仰符号在对照组中更为普遍[60%比42%]。两组间的测量差异均无统计学意义。作者得出结论,Haglund的畸形并不是插入性跟腱炎的指示,实际上存在于无症状的患者中。进一步得出结论,在插入性跟腱炎的手术治疗中,切除Haglund畸形可能是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信