Gender Differences in Pain Experience and Physical Activity of Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patients

A. I. Sánchez, M. Valenza, M. P. Martínez, E. Miró, Fabian N. Diener, M. Lami, R. Cáliz
{"title":"Gender Differences in Pain Experience and Physical Activity of Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patients","authors":"A. I. Sánchez, M. Valenza, M. P. Martínez, E. Miró, Fabian N. Diener, M. Lami, R. Cáliz","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2013.796036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: To date, very few studies have analyzed gender differences in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome [FMS], as the prevalence of this syndrome is much lower in males than females. The aim of this study was to explore how gender differences affect the experience of pain, physical activity and psychological measures of FMS patients compared to healthy normal controls [HNCs]. Methods: Women and men with FMS were recruited for this study. Demographically matching HNCs were recruited for comparison. A pressure algometer was used to measure patients’ pressure pain thresholds [PPTs]. Participants completed the visual analog scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Results: Thirty-eight patients with FMS [21 women and 17 men] and 32 HNCs [18 women and 14 men] participated in the study. The PPTs, physical activity and psychological measures showed no significant gender differences between male and female FMS patients [p > 0.05]. Post-hoc analyses showed significant differences in sleep quality and pain intensity between FMS patients and HNCs [p < 0.05]. Regarding physical activity, significant differences were found between men with FMS and healthy men in household activities [p < 0.05]. In women with FMS, sleep quality was negatively correlated with two measures of physical activity [sport and leisure time, p < 0.05]. In men, no significant correlations were found between the measures assessed. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the abnormal nociceptive processing recognized in FMS is similar between genders. As expected, FMS patients rated pain sensations higher on all scales compared to healthy groups. In addition, male and female FMS patients had lower pain thresholds than HNCs. In women with FMS, only sleep quality was significantly correlated with physical activity. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"21 1","pages":"147 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2013.796036","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2013.796036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To date, very few studies have analyzed gender differences in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome [FMS], as the prevalence of this syndrome is much lower in males than females. The aim of this study was to explore how gender differences affect the experience of pain, physical activity and psychological measures of FMS patients compared to healthy normal controls [HNCs]. Methods: Women and men with FMS were recruited for this study. Demographically matching HNCs were recruited for comparison. A pressure algometer was used to measure patients’ pressure pain thresholds [PPTs]. Participants completed the visual analog scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Results: Thirty-eight patients with FMS [21 women and 17 men] and 32 HNCs [18 women and 14 men] participated in the study. The PPTs, physical activity and psychological measures showed no significant gender differences between male and female FMS patients [p > 0.05]. Post-hoc analyses showed significant differences in sleep quality and pain intensity between FMS patients and HNCs [p < 0.05]. Regarding physical activity, significant differences were found between men with FMS and healthy men in household activities [p < 0.05]. In women with FMS, sleep quality was negatively correlated with two measures of physical activity [sport and leisure time, p < 0.05]. In men, no significant correlations were found between the measures assessed. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the abnormal nociceptive processing recognized in FMS is similar between genders. As expected, FMS patients rated pain sensations higher on all scales compared to healthy groups. In addition, male and female FMS patients had lower pain thresholds than HNCs. In women with FMS, only sleep quality was significantly correlated with physical activity. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these results.
纤维肌痛综合征患者疼痛体验和体力活动的性别差异
摘要目的:迄今为止,很少有研究分析纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者的性别差异,因为该综合征在男性中的患病率远低于女性。本研究的目的是探讨与健康正常对照相比,性别差异如何影响FMS患者的疼痛体验、身体活动和心理测量[HNCs]。方法:本研究招募了FMS患者。招募人口统计学上匹配的HNCs进行比较。使用压力计测量患者的压力痛阈值[PPTs]。受试者完成McGill疼痛问卷视觉模拟量表、修正Baecke体力活动问卷、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和纤维肌痛影响问卷。结果:38例FMS患者(女性21例,男性17例)和32例HNCs患者(女性18例,男性14例)参与了研究。男性和女性FMS患者在PPTs、体力活动和心理测量方面无显著性别差异[p > 0.05]。事后分析显示,FMS患者和HNCs患者在睡眠质量和疼痛强度方面存在显著差异[p < 0.05]。在体力活动方面,FMS男性与健康男性在家务活动方面存在显著差异[p < 0.05]。在FMS女性中,睡眠质量与两项体力活动指标呈负相关[运动和休闲时间,p < 0.05]。在男性中,评估的指标之间没有发现显著的相关性。结论:这些发现提示FMS识别的异常伤害性加工在性别之间是相似的。不出所料,与健康组相比,FMS患者在所有量表上对疼痛感觉的评分都更高。此外,男性和女性FMS患者的疼痛阈值低于HNCs。在患有FMS的女性中,只有睡眠质量与体育活动显著相关。需要更大样本的进一步研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信