Non-traditional support workers delivering a brief psychosocial intervention for older people with anxiety and depression: the NOTEPAD feasibility study

H. Burroughs, B. Bartlam, Peter Bullock, K. Lovell, R. Ogollah, Mo Ray, P. Bower, W. Waheed, S. Gilbody, T. Kingstone, E. Nicholls, C. Chew‐Graham
{"title":"Non-traditional support workers delivering a brief psychosocial intervention for older people with anxiety and depression: the NOTEPAD feasibility study","authors":"H. Burroughs, B. Bartlam, Peter Bullock, K. Lovell, R. Ogollah, Mo Ray, P. Bower, W. Waheed, S. Gilbody, T. Kingstone, E. Nicholls, C. Chew‐Graham","doi":"10.3310/HSDR07250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxiety and depression often coexist in older people. These disorders are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, and are associated with increased use of health and social care services, and raised mortality. Barriers to diagnosis include the reluctance of older people to present to their general practitioner (GP) with mood symptoms because of the stigma they perceive about mental health problems, and because the treatments offered are not acceptable to them.To refine a community-based psychosocial intervention for older people with anxiety and/or depression so that it can be delivered by non-traditional providers such, as support workers (SWs), in the third sector. To determine whether or not SWs can be trained to deliver this intervention to older people with anxiety and/or depression. To test procedures and determine if it is feasible to recruit and randomise patients, and to conduct a process evaluation to provide essential information to inform a randomised trial.Three phases, all informed by a patient and public involvement and engagement group. Qualitative work with older people and third-sector providers, plus a consensus group to refine the intervention, training, SW manuals and patient participant materials (phase 1). Recruitment and training of SWs (phase 2). Feasibility study to test recruitment procedures and assess fidelity of delivery of the intervention; and interviews with study participants, SWs and GPs to assess acceptability of the intervention and impact on routine care (phase 3).North Staffordshire, in collaboration with Age UK North Staffordshire.A psychosocial intervention, comprising one-to-one contact between older people with anxiety and/or depression and a SW employed by Age UK North Staffordshire, based on the principles of behavioural activation (BA), with encouragement to participate in a group activity.Initial qualitative work contributed to refinement of the psychosocial intervention. Recruitment (and retention) of the SWs was possible; the training, support materials and manual were acceptable to them, and they delivered the intervention as intended. Recruitment of practices from which to recruit patients was possible, but the recruitment target (100 patients) was not achieved, with 38 older adults randomised. Retention at 4 months was 86%. The study was not powered to demonstrate differences in outcomes. Older people in the intervention arm found the sessions with SWs acceptable, although signposting to, and attending, groups was not valued by all participants. GPs recognised the need for additional care for older people with anxiety and depression, which they could not provide. Participation in the study did not have an impact on routine care, other than responding to the calls from the study team about risk of self-harm. GPs were not aware of the work done by SWs with patients.Target recruitment was not achieved.Support workers recruited from Age UK employees can be recruited and trained to deliver an intervention, based on the principles of BA, to older people with anxiety and/or depression. The training and supervision model used in the study was acceptable to SWs, and the intervention was acceptable to older people.Further development of recruitment strategies is needed before this intervention can be tested in a fully powered randomised controlled trial.Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16318986.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR07250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anxiety and depression often coexist in older people. These disorders are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, and are associated with increased use of health and social care services, and raised mortality. Barriers to diagnosis include the reluctance of older people to present to their general practitioner (GP) with mood symptoms because of the stigma they perceive about mental health problems, and because the treatments offered are not acceptable to them.To refine a community-based psychosocial intervention for older people with anxiety and/or depression so that it can be delivered by non-traditional providers such, as support workers (SWs), in the third sector. To determine whether or not SWs can be trained to deliver this intervention to older people with anxiety and/or depression. To test procedures and determine if it is feasible to recruit and randomise patients, and to conduct a process evaluation to provide essential information to inform a randomised trial.Three phases, all informed by a patient and public involvement and engagement group. Qualitative work with older people and third-sector providers, plus a consensus group to refine the intervention, training, SW manuals and patient participant materials (phase 1). Recruitment and training of SWs (phase 2). Feasibility study to test recruitment procedures and assess fidelity of delivery of the intervention; and interviews with study participants, SWs and GPs to assess acceptability of the intervention and impact on routine care (phase 3).North Staffordshire, in collaboration with Age UK North Staffordshire.A psychosocial intervention, comprising one-to-one contact between older people with anxiety and/or depression and a SW employed by Age UK North Staffordshire, based on the principles of behavioural activation (BA), with encouragement to participate in a group activity.Initial qualitative work contributed to refinement of the psychosocial intervention. Recruitment (and retention) of the SWs was possible; the training, support materials and manual were acceptable to them, and they delivered the intervention as intended. Recruitment of practices from which to recruit patients was possible, but the recruitment target (100 patients) was not achieved, with 38 older adults randomised. Retention at 4 months was 86%. The study was not powered to demonstrate differences in outcomes. Older people in the intervention arm found the sessions with SWs acceptable, although signposting to, and attending, groups was not valued by all participants. GPs recognised the need for additional care for older people with anxiety and depression, which they could not provide. Participation in the study did not have an impact on routine care, other than responding to the calls from the study team about risk of self-harm. GPs were not aware of the work done by SWs with patients.Target recruitment was not achieved.Support workers recruited from Age UK employees can be recruited and trained to deliver an intervention, based on the principles of BA, to older people with anxiety and/or depression. The training and supervision model used in the study was acceptable to SWs, and the intervention was acceptable to older people.Further development of recruitment strategies is needed before this intervention can be tested in a fully powered randomised controlled trial.Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16318986.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 7, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
非传统支持工作者为患有焦虑和抑郁的老年人提供简短的社会心理干预:NOTEPAD可行性研究
焦虑和抑郁经常在老年人中共存。这些疾病往往未得到充分诊断和治疗,并与卫生和社会保健服务的使用增加以及死亡率升高有关。诊断的障碍包括老年人不愿向他们的全科医生(GP)提出情绪症状,因为他们认为心理健康问题是耻辱,而且所提供的治疗方法对他们来说是不可接受的。完善针对焦虑和/或抑郁老年人的基于社区的社会心理干预,使其能够由非传统提供者(如第三部门的支助工作者)提供。确定社会福利人员是否可以接受培训,为患有焦虑和/或抑郁的老年人提供这种干预措施。测试程序,确定招募和随机患者是否可行,并进行过程评估,为随机试验提供必要信息。三个阶段,所有阶段都由患者和公众参与和参与小组告知。与老年人和第三部门提供者进行定性工作,再加上一个共识小组,以完善干预、培训、社会福利手册和患者参与材料(第一阶段)。社会福利人员的招募和培训(第二阶段)。可行性研究,以测试招募程序和评估提供干预的保真度;并与研究参与者、社会福利工作者和全科医生进行访谈,以评估干预的可接受性及其对常规护理的影响(第三阶段)。北斯塔福德郡,与英国老年协会北斯塔福德郡合作。一种社会心理干预,包括根据行为激活(BA)的原则,在患有焦虑和/或抑郁的老年人和北斯塔福德郡Age UK雇用的SW之间进行一对一的接触,并鼓励他们参与小组活动。最初的定性工作有助于改进心理社会干预。有可能招聘(和保留)社会福利工人;培训、支持材料和手册对他们来说是可以接受的,他们按照预期交付了干预措施。招募患者的实践是可能的,但招募目标(100例患者)未实现,随机选取38名老年人。4个月时的留存率为86%。这项研究没有能力证明结果的差异。干预组的老年人发现与社会福利工作者的会议是可以接受的,尽管并不是所有参与者都重视小组的指示和参加。全科医生认识到需要为焦虑和抑郁的老年人提供额外的护理,而他们无法提供。除了响应研究小组关于自残风险的电话外,参与研究对日常护理没有影响。全科医生并不知道社工为病人所做的工作。没有达到招聘目标。可以从Age UK员工中招募并培训支持人员,根据BA的原则,为患有焦虑和/或抑郁症的老年人提供干预。研究中使用的培训和监督模式为社会福利工作者所接受,干预措施为老年人所接受。在该干预措施能够在完全随机对照试验中进行测试之前,需要进一步制定招募策略。当前对照试验ISRCTN16318986。该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和交付研究方案资助,将全文发表在《卫生服务和交付研究》上;第七卷,第25期请参阅NIHR期刊图书馆网站了解更多项目信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信