The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in hemodialysis patients
Q4 Social Sciences
E. Volodina, N. Frolova, M. Lysenko, I.G. Kim, A. Ushakova, V. Vinogradov, S. S. Usatiuk, A. Nikitina, U. Markina, V. I. Chervinko, E. Kryukov, M. Zubkin
求助PDF
{"title":"The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in hemodialysis patients","authors":"E. Volodina, N. Frolova, M. Lysenko, I.G. Kim, A. Ushakova, V. Vinogradov, S. S. Usatiuk, A. Nikitina, U. Markina, V. I. Chervinko, E. Kryukov, M. Zubkin","doi":"10.33029/2305-3496-2022-11-4-38-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis have one of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. The use of innovative methods capable of optimizing their treatment outcomes is important for clinical practice. Aims – to investigate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in COVID-19 patients treated with hemodialysis. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective controlled single-center study with 102 COVID-19 patients on maintenance hemodialysis involved (M: 67;65.7%;W: 35;34.3%), aged 57.2±15.3 years. PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in all patients. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were administered to 69 patients, who formed the study group (group 1). The control group included 33 patients (group 2). The combination of bamlanevimab and etesevimab was the most frequent therapy used (in 59 patients). Results. In the course of the disease, group 1 patients, compared to those of group 2, had statistically significantly higher blood oxygen saturation values (94.2±5.7 vs 89.8±10.7);they required less frequent oxygen support (29.0 vs 54.5%) and ICU treatment (18.8 vs 48.5%), respectively. Fatal outcomes occurred in 4 (5.8%) of 69 patients who received neutralizing antibodies and in 6 (18.2%) of 33 patients who did not receive the therapy, p<0.05. Except for one patient, all other patients in both groups developed an unfavorable outcome due to progressive lung damage. However, only 4 of 6 (2/3) patients with progressive lung damage died in group 1, whereas the similar course of the disease proved fatal in all cases in group 2. Conclusion. The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in hemodialysis patients is safe and effective when the drugs are administered early, the pulmonary process progression is insignificant and dominant SARSCoV-2 variants are sensitive to them. © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":36113,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2022-11-4-38-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis have one of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. The use of innovative methods capable of optimizing their treatment outcomes is important for clinical practice. Aims – to investigate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in COVID-19 patients treated with hemodialysis. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective controlled single-center study with 102 COVID-19 patients on maintenance hemodialysis involved (M: 67;65.7%;W: 35;34.3%), aged 57.2±15.3 years. PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in all patients. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were administered to 69 patients, who formed the study group (group 1). The control group included 33 patients (group 2). The combination of bamlanevimab and etesevimab was the most frequent therapy used (in 59 patients). Results. In the course of the disease, group 1 patients, compared to those of group 2, had statistically significantly higher blood oxygen saturation values (94.2±5.7 vs 89.8±10.7);they required less frequent oxygen support (29.0 vs 54.5%) and ICU treatment (18.8 vs 48.5%), respectively. Fatal outcomes occurred in 4 (5.8%) of 69 patients who received neutralizing antibodies and in 6 (18.2%) of 33 patients who did not receive the therapy, p<0.05. Except for one patient, all other patients in both groups developed an unfavorable outcome due to progressive lung damage. However, only 4 of 6 (2/3) patients with progressive lung damage died in group 1, whereas the similar course of the disease proved fatal in all cases in group 2. Conclusion. The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in hemodialysis patients is safe and effective when the drugs are administered early, the pulmonary process progression is insignificant and dominant SARSCoV-2 variants are sensitive to them. © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.
抗SARS-CoV-2中和性单克隆抗体在血液透析患者中的应用
接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者是COVID-19死亡率最高的患者之一。使用能够优化其治疗结果的创新方法对临床实践很重要。目的:探讨中和性单克隆抗体在血液透析治疗的COVID-19患者中的疗效和安全性。材料和方法。我们对102例参与维持性血液透析的COVID-19患者进行了回顾性对照单中心研究(男:67例;65.7%;女:35例;34.3%),年龄57.2±15.3岁。所有患者均经pcr检测为SARS-CoV-2感染。给予69例患者中和性单克隆抗体,组成研究组(1组)。对照组包括33例患者(2组)。bamlanevimab和etesevimab联合使用是最常用的治疗方法(59例)。结果。在病程中,1组患者的血氧饱和度(94.2±5.7 vs 89.8±10.7)高于2组患者,需要更少的氧支持(29.0 vs 54.5%)和ICU治疗(18.8 vs 48.5%)。69例接受中和抗体治疗的患者中有4例(5.8%)死亡,33例未接受中和抗体治疗的患者中有6例(18.2%)死亡,p<0.05。除1例患者外,两组中所有其他患者均因进行性肺损伤而出现不良结果。然而,在第1组中,6例进行性肺损伤患者中只有4例(2/3)死亡,而在第2组中,病程相似的所有病例均死亡。结论。在血液透析患者中使用中和性单克隆抗体是安全有效的,前提是早期给药,肺过程进展不显著,显性SARSCoV-2变异对它们敏感。©2022托木斯克理工大学出版社。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。