Effect of Ageing on Otoacoustic Emissions and Efferent Suppression in Humans: Efectos de la edad en las emisiones otoacústicas y (EN LA) supresión eferente en humanos

N. Quaranta, S. Debole, S. Di Girolamo
{"title":"Effect of Ageing on Otoacoustic Emissions and Efferent Suppression in Humans: Efectos de la edad en las emisiones otoacústicas y (EN LA) supresión eferente en humanos","authors":"N. Quaranta, S. Debole, S. Di Girolamo","doi":"10.3109/00206090109073127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) without and with contralateral acoustical stimulation, were recorded on 52 subjects ranging from 20 to 78 years. Subject selection was based on the hearing levels from 0.5 to 4 kHz being better than 25 dB HL, normal tympanograms and stapedial reflexes, presence of TEOAEs in at least one ear and no history of otological disease, noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, metabolic disease associated with hearing loss or a family history of hearing loss. The ear with better audiological thresholds was selected as the test ear. If there was no difference between the ears, the ear with stronger TEOAEs was selected. Subjects were divided into five age groups: 20–34 years (n=12, mean age 23.7). 35–44 (n=11, mean age 39.7), 45–54 (n=8, mean age 48.1), 55–64 (n=10, mean age 60), 65–78 (n=11, mean age 71). TEOAEs were never absent in the first two groups, but they were absent in two ears in the 45–54 group, and in one ear of the 55–64 and 65–78 groups. Mean TEOAE amplitude decreased with age, but the differences between the five groups were not significant. Contralateral white noise suppressed emission amplitude, but the amount of suppression was not significantly different between the five groups. A linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between age and hearing levels, and a negative correlation between age and TEOAE amplitude. In addition, a significant negative correlation between hearing threshold and TEOAE amplitude was evident. No effect of age on the amplitude of the efferent suppression was found.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"308 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206090109073127","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) without and with contralateral acoustical stimulation, were recorded on 52 subjects ranging from 20 to 78 years. Subject selection was based on the hearing levels from 0.5 to 4 kHz being better than 25 dB HL, normal tympanograms and stapedial reflexes, presence of TEOAEs in at least one ear and no history of otological disease, noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, metabolic disease associated with hearing loss or a family history of hearing loss. The ear with better audiological thresholds was selected as the test ear. If there was no difference between the ears, the ear with stronger TEOAEs was selected. Subjects were divided into five age groups: 20–34 years (n=12, mean age 23.7). 35–44 (n=11, mean age 39.7), 45–54 (n=8, mean age 48.1), 55–64 (n=10, mean age 60), 65–78 (n=11, mean age 71). TEOAEs were never absent in the first two groups, but they were absent in two ears in the 45–54 group, and in one ear of the 55–64 and 65–78 groups. Mean TEOAE amplitude decreased with age, but the differences between the five groups were not significant. Contralateral white noise suppressed emission amplitude, but the amount of suppression was not significantly different between the five groups. A linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between age and hearing levels, and a negative correlation between age and TEOAE amplitude. In addition, a significant negative correlation between hearing threshold and TEOAE amplitude was evident. No effect of age on the amplitude of the efferent suppression was found.
年龄对人耳声发射和排出抑制的影响:年龄对人耳声发射和排出抑制的影响
对52名年龄在20岁至78岁之间的受试者进行了无或有对侧声刺激的瞬时诱发耳声发射(teoae)记录。受试者的选择标准为:听力水平在0.5 - 4 kHz范围内优于25 dB HL,鼓室图和镫骨反射正常,至少一只耳朵存在teoae,无耳科疾病史、噪音暴露史、耳毒性药物史、与听力损失相关的代谢性疾病史或听力损失家族史。选择听力学阈值较好的耳作为试验耳。如果耳朵之间没有差异,则选择teoae较强的耳朵。研究对象分为5个年龄组:20 ~ 34岁(n=12,平均23.7岁)。35 ~ 44岁(n=11,平均年龄39.7)、45 ~ 54岁(n=8,平均年龄48.1)、55 ~ 64岁(n=10,平均年龄60)、65 ~ 78岁(n=11,平均年龄71)。前两组均未出现teoae缺失,但45-54组有2耳缺失,55-64和65-78组有1耳缺失。平均TEOAE振幅随年龄的增长而下降,但五组间差异不显著。对侧白噪声对发射幅值有抑制作用,但抑制量在五组间无显著差异。线性回归分析显示年龄与听力水平呈显著相关,年龄与TEOAE振幅呈负相关。此外,听力阈值与TEOAE振幅呈显著负相关。年龄对传出抑制的幅度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书