Objective Detection of the Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR):Detectión objetiva de la respuesta consecuente de amplitud modulada (AMFR)

Mario Cebulla, Ekkehard Stürzebecher, K. Wernecke
{"title":"Objective Detection of the Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR):Detectión objetiva de la respuesta consecuente de amplitud modulada (AMFR)","authors":"Mario Cebulla, Ekkehard Stürzebecher, K. Wernecke","doi":"10.3109/00206090109073118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) has been shown to be a promising tool for objective frequency-specific assessment of hearing thresholds in children. AMFR is represented in the frequency domain by a single spectral line. This simplifies the objective statistical detection in comparison to other responses with a more complex waveform. The aim of the present study is to compare the performance of four known tests (phase coherence (PC), new Hotelling T2 (HT2*), modified PC (PC*), magnitude-squared coherence (MSC)) on the basis of a large sample (n = 1484) of AMFR recordings (stimulus level of 30 dB nHL in normally-hearing subjects, and 30 dB SL in hearing-impaired subjects) to find the test best suited for AMFR detection. The decision was made on the basis of the detection rates as well as of the ROC curves. Based on the large data pool, MSC and PC* show equal performance and a small but consistent advantage in objective detection of AMFR over HT2* and PC.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"245 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206090109073118","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) has been shown to be a promising tool for objective frequency-specific assessment of hearing thresholds in children. AMFR is represented in the frequency domain by a single spectral line. This simplifies the objective statistical detection in comparison to other responses with a more complex waveform. The aim of the present study is to compare the performance of four known tests (phase coherence (PC), new Hotelling T2 (HT2*), modified PC (PC*), magnitude-squared coherence (MSC)) on the basis of a large sample (n = 1484) of AMFR recordings (stimulus level of 30 dB nHL in normally-hearing subjects, and 30 dB SL in hearing-impaired subjects) to find the test best suited for AMFR detection. The decision was made on the basis of the detection rates as well as of the ROC curves. Based on the large data pool, MSC and PC* show equal performance and a small but consistent advantage in objective detection of AMFR over HT2* and PC.
振幅调制响应(AMFR)的客观检测:振幅调制响应(AMFR)的客观检测
响应后振幅调制(AMFR)已被证明是一种有前途的工具,用于客观的频率特异性评估儿童听力阈值。AMFR在频域用一条谱线表示。与其他具有更复杂波形的响应相比,这简化了客观统计检测。本研究的目的是在大样本(n = 1484) AMFR记录(听力正常受试者的刺激水平为30 dB nHL,听力受损受试者的刺激水平为30 dB SL)的基础上,比较四种已知测试(相位相干性(PC)、新Hotelling T2 (HT2*)、改进PC (PC*)、幅度平方相干性(MSC))的性能,以寻找最适合AMFR检测的测试。决定是根据检出率和ROC曲线。基于大数据池,MSC和PC*在AMFR的客观检测方面表现出与HT2*和PC相同的性能和较小但一致的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书