Pleistocene Axes in Sahul: a response to Morwood and Tresize

Q1 Arts and Humanities
S. Sutton
{"title":"Pleistocene Axes in Sahul: a response to Morwood and Tresize","authors":"S. Sutton","doi":"10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is written in response to ideas and information presented by Morwood and Tresize (1989) pertaining to the antiquity and distribution of axes in Sahul and in particular to one axe from S.E. Cape York. It is felt that this response is necessary because, whilst Morwood and Tresize raise some important issues and identify some apparent trends in the late Pleistocene of Sahul, their paper also engenders some confusion about these and other issues.  Whilst I will not contend that the axe is a \"false fact\" it is true that serious consideration to the validity of the inferences Morwood and Tresize present is necessary due to the nascent nature of our understanding of Pleistocene humans and Morwood and Tresize's suggestions in this regard.","PeriodicalId":37597,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Archaeological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper is written in response to ideas and information presented by Morwood and Tresize (1989) pertaining to the antiquity and distribution of axes in Sahul and in particular to one axe from S.E. Cape York. It is felt that this response is necessary because, whilst Morwood and Tresize raise some important issues and identify some apparent trends in the late Pleistocene of Sahul, their paper also engenders some confusion about these and other issues.  Whilst I will not contend that the axe is a "false fact" it is true that serious consideration to the validity of the inferences Morwood and Tresize present is necessary due to the nascent nature of our understanding of Pleistocene humans and Morwood and Tresize's suggestions in this regard.
Sahul更新世轴:对Morwood和Tresize的响应
本文是根据Morwood和Tresize(1989)提出的观点和信息撰写的,这些观点和信息与Sahul的斧头的古代和分布有关,特别是来自南开普约克的一把斧头。我们认为这种回应是必要的,因为尽管Morwood和Tresize提出了一些重要的问题,并确定了Sahul晚更新世的一些明显趋势,但他们的论文也引起了对这些问题和其他问题的一些混淆。Â虽然我不会争辩说斧头是一个“错误的事实”,但确实有必要认真考虑Morwood和Tresize提出的推论的有效性,因为我们对更新世人类以及Morwood和Tresize在这方面的建议的理解是新生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Queensland Archaeological Research
Queensland Archaeological Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Queensland Archaeological Research is a peer-reviewed journal published since 1984 devoted to publishing substantive, original and high-quality archaeological research pertaining to Queensland, Australia and adjacent areas. Data-rich manuscripts are particularly welcome. Queensland Archaeological Research is published in English in one volume each year. Submission of articles to Queensland Archaeological Research is free. Access to articles in Queensland Archaeological Research is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信