The Combined Value of Faecal Haemoglobin and Calprotectin in Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in Symptomatic Patients Referred to Colonoscopy

R. Palmqvist
{"title":"The Combined Value of Faecal Haemoglobin and Calprotectin in Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in Symptomatic Patients Referred to Colonoscopy","authors":"R. Palmqvist","doi":"10.33552/ajgh.2019.01.000514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and has a considerable impact on both the individual and the health care system. The majority of patients with CRC have their initial consultation in primary care [1]. However, the symptoms of CRC often present late. In addition, a vast majority of patients seeking primary care for symptoms associated with CRC (rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habits, diarrhoea, constipation and abdominal pain) are not diagnosed with CRC [2-4]. Therefore, general screening programs among individuals at average risk for CRC, along with guidelines for urgent referral, are implemented widely to reduce mortality of the disease [5,6]. However, there is still a need for improved screening strategies for CRC [4,7,3]. The recommended “gold standard” screening tool for CRC today is endoscopic examination, such as sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, but such examinations are resource-demanding, highly costly and inconvenient for the patients [8-11]. The most important factor in screening is patient adherence, and therefore annual faecal occult blood tests have been suggested as an alternative to endoscopy in CRC screening [7]. Analysis of faecal haemoglobin (F-Hb) using either guaiac-based (gFOBT) tests or, more recently, immunological (FIT) tests [12] is commonly used as a primary screening tool, since it requires no preparation, is cost-effective, and relatively convenient for the patient [13]. A positive F-Hb test is an indication of bleeding in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which could be caused *Corresponding author: Richard Palmqvist, Department of Medical Biosciences/ Pathology, Umeå University, Sweden. Received Date: September 12, 2019 Published Date: September 17, 2019 Scientific Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Open Access","PeriodicalId":72038,"journal":{"name":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ajgh.2019.01.000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and has a considerable impact on both the individual and the health care system. The majority of patients with CRC have their initial consultation in primary care [1]. However, the symptoms of CRC often present late. In addition, a vast majority of patients seeking primary care for symptoms associated with CRC (rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habits, diarrhoea, constipation and abdominal pain) are not diagnosed with CRC [2-4]. Therefore, general screening programs among individuals at average risk for CRC, along with guidelines for urgent referral, are implemented widely to reduce mortality of the disease [5,6]. However, there is still a need for improved screening strategies for CRC [4,7,3]. The recommended “gold standard” screening tool for CRC today is endoscopic examination, such as sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, but such examinations are resource-demanding, highly costly and inconvenient for the patients [8-11]. The most important factor in screening is patient adherence, and therefore annual faecal occult blood tests have been suggested as an alternative to endoscopy in CRC screening [7]. Analysis of faecal haemoglobin (F-Hb) using either guaiac-based (gFOBT) tests or, more recently, immunological (FIT) tests [12] is commonly used as a primary screening tool, since it requires no preparation, is cost-effective, and relatively convenient for the patient [13]. A positive F-Hb test is an indication of bleeding in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which could be caused *Corresponding author: Richard Palmqvist, Department of Medical Biosciences/ Pathology, Umeå University, Sweden. Received Date: September 12, 2019 Published Date: September 17, 2019 Scientific Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Open Access
粪便血红蛋白和钙保护蛋白在结肠镜检查有症状的结直肠癌患者中的联合诊断价值
结直肠癌(CRC)是全球第三大最常诊断的癌症,对个人和医疗保健系统都有相当大的影响。大多数结直肠癌患者在初级保健机构进行首次咨询。然而,结直肠癌的症状往往出现较晚。此外,绝大多数因CRC相关症状(直肠出血、排便习惯改变、腹泻、便秘和腹痛)而寻求初级保健的患者未被诊断为CRC[2-4]。因此,在CRC平均风险人群中进行一般筛查计划,以及紧急转诊指南,被广泛实施,以降低该疾病的死亡率[5,6]。然而,仍然需要改进CRC的筛查策略[4,7,3]。目前推荐的CRC筛查“金标准”是内镜检查,如乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查,但此类检查资源消耗大,费用高,对患者不方便[8-11]。筛查中最重要的因素是患者的依从性,因此建议每年进行粪便隐血检查作为CRC筛查中内镜检查的替代方法。使用愈创木(ggfbt)试验或最近的免疫(FIT)试验分析粪便血红蛋白(F-Hb)[12]通常被用作主要筛查工具,因为它不需要制备,具有成本效益,并且对患者[13]相对方便。F-Hb检测阳性是胃肠道出血的指示,这可能导致*通讯作者:Richard Palmqvist,瑞典尤梅夫大学医学生物科学/病理学系。发表日期:2019年9月17日science Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology开放获取
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信