Modern systems of organization of decisions enforcement and legal status of executors

Q3 Social Sciences
N. Sergiienko, S. Tsebenko, M. Saienko, M. Potip, O. Dragan
{"title":"Modern systems of organization of decisions enforcement\nand legal status of executors","authors":"N. Sergiienko, S. Tsebenko, M. Saienko, M. Potip, O. Dragan","doi":"10.32914/i.55.1-2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is as follows: if the substantive decision of a court or other jurisdiction (offi-cial) is subject to enforcement, the state must provide an effective mechanism for such kind of enforce-ment (otherwise, in case of non-compliance with the decision by the obligated person, protection of rights, freedoms, interests of the person will remain only on paper). An important component of such a mechanism is the system of enforcement of decisions. Therefore, each state faces the question of which system of enforcement of decisions to choose, and here we need the experience of other states that have already passed this path and can already clearly understand the results. The purpose of the article is to consider the experience of foreign states in reforming the system of enforcement of decisions and the legal status of executors in order to implement it in Ukraine. Methodological basis of the scientific arti-cle is general and special methods of scientific research (deductive, analytical, synthesis method, hermeneutic method, comparative, statistical, historical, dialectical and other methods), which were used to cover the topic of the scientific article. The results of the study contain a generalization of the experience of foreign countries in reforming the system of enforcement of decisions and the legal status of executors. The practical significance of the study is that the scientific article analyzes the application of different systems of organization of enforcement of court decisions, other bodies (officials), different approaches to the legal regulation of the legal status of executors. This can be useful for both legal scholars and legal practitioners, as well as anyone interested in reforming executive legislation.","PeriodicalId":35333,"journal":{"name":"Informatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study is as follows: if the substantive decision of a court or other jurisdiction (offi-cial) is subject to enforcement, the state must provide an effective mechanism for such kind of enforce-ment (otherwise, in case of non-compliance with the decision by the obligated person, protection of rights, freedoms, interests of the person will remain only on paper). An important component of such a mechanism is the system of enforcement of decisions. Therefore, each state faces the question of which system of enforcement of decisions to choose, and here we need the experience of other states that have already passed this path and can already clearly understand the results. The purpose of the article is to consider the experience of foreign states in reforming the system of enforcement of decisions and the legal status of executors in order to implement it in Ukraine. Methodological basis of the scientific arti-cle is general and special methods of scientific research (deductive, analytical, synthesis method, hermeneutic method, comparative, statistical, historical, dialectical and other methods), which were used to cover the topic of the scientific article. The results of the study contain a generalization of the experience of foreign countries in reforming the system of enforcement of decisions and the legal status of executors. The practical significance of the study is that the scientific article analyzes the application of different systems of organization of enforcement of court decisions, other bodies (officials), different approaches to the legal regulation of the legal status of executors. This can be useful for both legal scholars and legal practitioners, as well as anyone interested in reforming executive legislation.
现代决策执行组织制度和执行人的法律地位
该研究的相关性如下:如果法院或其他司法管辖区(官方)的实质性决定需要执行,国家必须为这种执行提供有效的机制(否则,在被义务人不遵守决定的情况下,对该人的权利、自由和利益的保护将仅停留在纸面上)。这种机制的一个重要组成部分是执行决定的制度。因此,每个州都面临着选择哪种制度来执行决定的问题,在这方面,我们需要其他已经走过这条道路并已经清楚地了解其结果的州的经验。本文的目的是考虑外国在改革决定执行制度和执行者的法律地位方面的经验,以便在乌克兰实施。科学文章的方法论基础是科学研究的一般方法和特殊方法(演绎法、分析法、综合法、解释学方法、比较方法、统计方法、历史方法、辩证方法等),这些方法被用来涵盖科学文章的主题。这项研究的结果概括了外国在改革决定执行制度和执行人法律地位方面的经验。本研究的现实意义在于科学地分析了不同制度下法院判决的执行组织、其他主体(官员)、不同的法律规制方式对执行人法律地位的影响。这对法律学者和法律从业者以及任何对改革行政立法感兴趣的人都很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informatologia
Informatologia Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: INFORMATOLOGIA is scientific journal which is dealing with general and specific problems in scientific field of Information Science. INFORMATOLOGIA publishes scientific and professional papers from information and communication sciences, which are refering to theory, technology and praxis of information and communication, education, communication science, journalism, public relations, media and visual communication, organisation and translotology and papers from related scientific fields. INFORMATOLOGIA is beeing published over thirty years and it gathers prominent experts in field of Information and Communication Science. The journal is published four times a year and it publishes scientific papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信