J. L. Caldu-Primo, J. Dávila-Velderrain, Juan Carlos Martínez-García, E. Álvarez-Buylla
{"title":"Clarifying the biological nature of the interaction between the systems-based epigenetic landscape and the epigenome","authors":"J. L. Caldu-Primo, J. Dávila-Velderrain, Juan Carlos Martínez-García, E. Álvarez-Buylla","doi":"10.29007/1lps","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The epigenetic landscape concept initially proposed by Conrad H. Waddington has become a powerful tool to quantitatively address constraints underlying cell differentiation and morphogenesis. In theoretical and experimental terms, this has been enabled by grounding gene regulatory network models on experimental data. Such models have, in turn, led to proposing epigenetic landscape models that entail functional and structural constraints of cell differentiation and morphogenetic dynamics, and thus the understanding of development from a systems–based perspective. Therefore, it is mainly in the context of the study of development where the epigenetic landscape has been anchored as a conceptual support. On the other hand, nonetheless, given the recent understanding of gene control by epigenomic modifications and the capacity to profile these modifications using high– throughput molecular techniques, the notion of epigenetics has been mainly related to non-genetic heritable modifications of the genome. Therefore, this approach, which until now has not been based on a systems–based dynamical treatment, has given proximal epigenomic modifications a central role in understanding development. The latter, has left the dynamic view of epigenetic landscape aside. In this paper we aim at establishing a conceptual link between both conceptualizations of epigenetic regulation.","PeriodicalId":93549,"journal":{"name":"EPiC series in computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC series in computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/1lps","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The epigenetic landscape concept initially proposed by Conrad H. Waddington has become a powerful tool to quantitatively address constraints underlying cell differentiation and morphogenesis. In theoretical and experimental terms, this has been enabled by grounding gene regulatory network models on experimental data. Such models have, in turn, led to proposing epigenetic landscape models that entail functional and structural constraints of cell differentiation and morphogenetic dynamics, and thus the understanding of development from a systems–based perspective. Therefore, it is mainly in the context of the study of development where the epigenetic landscape has been anchored as a conceptual support. On the other hand, nonetheless, given the recent understanding of gene control by epigenomic modifications and the capacity to profile these modifications using high– throughput molecular techniques, the notion of epigenetics has been mainly related to non-genetic heritable modifications of the genome. Therefore, this approach, which until now has not been based on a systems–based dynamical treatment, has given proximal epigenomic modifications a central role in understanding development. The latter, has left the dynamic view of epigenetic landscape aside. In this paper we aim at establishing a conceptual link between both conceptualizations of epigenetic regulation.
最初由Conrad H. Waddington提出的表观遗传景观概念已经成为定量解决细胞分化和形态发生限制的有力工具。在理论和实验方面,这是通过在实验数据上建立基因调控网络模型来实现的。这样的模型反过来又导致了表观遗传景观模型的提出,这些模型需要细胞分化和形态发生动力学的功能和结构约束,从而从基于系统的角度理解发育。因此,它主要是在发展研究的背景下,表观遗传景观已被锚定为概念支持。另一方面,尽管如此,鉴于最近对表观基因组修饰的基因控制的理解以及使用高通量分子技术描述这些修饰的能力,表观遗传学的概念主要与基因组的非遗传遗传修饰有关。因此,这种迄今为止尚未基于系统动力学治疗的方法,已经赋予近端表观基因组修饰在理解发育方面的核心作用。后者把表观遗传景观的动态观点放在一边。在本文中,我们的目的是建立两个概念之间的概念联系表观遗传调控。