Persons as 'Symbols' and 'Carriers': Two Modes of Imagining the Individual and Society in the Nineteenth Century

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Warren Breckman
{"title":"Persons as 'Symbols' and 'Carriers': Two Modes of Imagining the Individual and Society in the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Warren Breckman","doi":"10.3138/ttr.40.2.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his mature systematic writings, Karl Marx pointedly restricted the discussion of individuals as such. Instead of discussing individual characters, motivations, or desires, Marx treats people as 'carriers' (Träger) of social relations. This essay contrasts this functional or structural approach to the Romantic socialism of Pierre Leroux, who conceptualized the individual in the symbolic terms defined by Romantic aesthetics. Though Marx's reduction of individuals to their social function played a valuable role in the development of his analysis of political economy, it has produced controversy across many decades and presented problems for the political project defined by Marxism. The Romantic conception of a symbolic intersection between the individual and society does not present a fully satisfying alternative to Marx, but this essay argues that it provides an important corrective to the conception of persons as carriers of social relations.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"65 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.40.2.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In his mature systematic writings, Karl Marx pointedly restricted the discussion of individuals as such. Instead of discussing individual characters, motivations, or desires, Marx treats people as 'carriers' (Träger) of social relations. This essay contrasts this functional or structural approach to the Romantic socialism of Pierre Leroux, who conceptualized the individual in the symbolic terms defined by Romantic aesthetics. Though Marx's reduction of individuals to their social function played a valuable role in the development of his analysis of political economy, it has produced controversy across many decades and presented problems for the political project defined by Marxism. The Romantic conception of a symbolic intersection between the individual and society does not present a fully satisfying alternative to Marx, but this essay argues that it provides an important corrective to the conception of persons as carriers of social relations.
作为“符号”和“载体”的人:19世纪个人与社会的两种想象模式
摘要:马克思在其成熟的系统著作中,尖锐地限制了对个体的讨论。马克思没有讨论个人的性格、动机或欲望,而是将人视为社会关系的“载体”(Träger)。本文将这种功能性或结构性的方法与皮埃尔·勒鲁(Pierre Leroux)的浪漫主义社会主义进行对比,勒鲁将个人概念化为浪漫主义美学所定义的象征术语。尽管马克思将个人还原为其社会功能在他的政治经济学分析的发展中发挥了宝贵的作用,但它在几十年中产生了争议,并为马克思主义所定义的政治工程提出了问题。浪漫主义关于个人与社会之间的象征性交集的概念并没有提供一个完全令人满意的替代马克思,但本文认为,它为个人作为社会关系载体的概念提供了一个重要的纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信