{"title":"A negação da nomenclatura e o isolamento do nome próprio","authors":"S. Henriques","doi":"10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P152-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neste artigo, investigamos as consideracoes de Ferdinand de Saussure sobre a categoria linguistica dos nomes proprios, especificamente na obra responsavel fundacao da Linguistica Moderna: o Curso de Linguistica Geral . Com o intuito de apreender de que maneira o nome proprio e considerado nessa obra, priorizamos dois pontos principais: a negacao da nomenclatura e a unica mencao dessa categoria feita no CLG. Partimos do pressuposto de que, apesar de nao ser evidente, tanto a negacao da nomenclatura quanto os nomes proprios relacionam-se com aspectos importantes da teoria saussuriana, tais como: arbitrariedade do signo, valor e parole. The negation of nomenclature and the isolation of proper name In this work we aim to investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’s considerations about the linguistic cathegory of proper names, specifically in the work responsible by the foundation of Modern Linguistics: Course in General Linguistics . In order to comprehend in which way the proper name is considered in that work, we prioritize two main points: the denial of nomenclature and the single mention of this category made in the CGL. We start from the assumption that, although it is not evident, both the denial of nomenclature and the proper names are related with important aspects of Saussure’s theory, such as the arbitrariness of sign, the value and the speech. Keywords: Proper names. Ferdinand de Saussure. CLG. Arbitrariness DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172","PeriodicalId":33154,"journal":{"name":"Leitura","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leitura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P152-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neste artigo, investigamos as consideracoes de Ferdinand de Saussure sobre a categoria linguistica dos nomes proprios, especificamente na obra responsavel fundacao da Linguistica Moderna: o Curso de Linguistica Geral . Com o intuito de apreender de que maneira o nome proprio e considerado nessa obra, priorizamos dois pontos principais: a negacao da nomenclatura e a unica mencao dessa categoria feita no CLG. Partimos do pressuposto de que, apesar de nao ser evidente, tanto a negacao da nomenclatura quanto os nomes proprios relacionam-se com aspectos importantes da teoria saussuriana, tais como: arbitrariedade do signo, valor e parole. The negation of nomenclature and the isolation of proper name In this work we aim to investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’s considerations about the linguistic cathegory of proper names, specifically in the work responsible by the foundation of Modern Linguistics: Course in General Linguistics . In order to comprehend in which way the proper name is considered in that work, we prioritize two main points: the denial of nomenclature and the single mention of this category made in the CGL. We start from the assumption that, although it is not evident, both the denial of nomenclature and the proper names are related with important aspects of Saussure’s theory, such as the arbitrariness of sign, the value and the speech. Keywords: Proper names. Ferdinand de Saussure. CLG. Arbitrariness DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172
在本文中,我们考察了索绪尔关于本体名词的语言范畴的思考,特别是在《现代语言学基础:一般语言学课程》一书中。为了理解本体名称是如何在这部作品中被考虑的,我们优先考虑了两个要点:对命名法的否定和CLG中对这一类别的唯一提及。我们假设,尽管不明显,但对命名法和专有名称的否定都与索绪尔理论的重要方面有关,如符号、价值和言语的随意性。命名法和隔离的negation适当的名字在这个工作我们的目标是investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’的‘关注语言的适当的名称,specifically cathegory工作负责任的现代语言学的基础:在普通语言学课程。为了了解在这项工作中考虑适当名称的方式,我们优先考虑两个主要问题:拒绝使用命名法和在《公约》中只提及这一类别。我们开始的假设,虽然它并不明显,拒绝命名和适当的名称与索绪尔的重要方面是相关的arbitrariness’的理论,这样的标志,价值和演讲。关键词:正确的名字。费迪南德·德·索绪尔。CLG。仲裁DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172