A negação da nomenclatura e o isolamento do nome próprio

S. Henriques
{"title":"A negação da nomenclatura e o isolamento do nome próprio","authors":"S. Henriques","doi":"10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P152-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neste artigo, investigamos as consideracoes de Ferdinand de Saussure sobre a categoria linguistica dos nomes proprios, especificamente na obra responsavel fundacao da Linguistica Moderna: o Curso de Linguistica Geral . Com o intuito de apreender de que maneira o nome proprio e considerado nessa obra, priorizamos dois pontos principais: a negacao da nomenclatura e a unica mencao dessa categoria feita no CLG. Partimos do pressuposto de que, apesar de nao ser evidente, tanto a negacao da nomenclatura quanto os nomes proprios relacionam-se com aspectos importantes da teoria saussuriana, tais como: arbitrariedade do signo, valor e parole. The negation of nomenclature and the isolation of proper name In this work we aim to investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’s considerations about the linguistic cathegory of proper names, specifically in the work responsible by the foundation of Modern Linguistics: Course in General Linguistics . In order to comprehend in which way the proper name is considered in that work, we prioritize two main points: the denial of nomenclature and the single mention of this category made in the CGL. We start from the assumption that, although it is not evident, both the denial of nomenclature and the proper names are related with important aspects of Saussure’s theory, such as the arbitrariness of sign, the value and the speech. Keywords: Proper names. Ferdinand de Saussure. CLG. Arbitrariness DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172","PeriodicalId":33154,"journal":{"name":"Leitura","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leitura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P152-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neste artigo, investigamos as consideracoes de Ferdinand de Saussure sobre a categoria linguistica dos nomes proprios, especificamente na obra responsavel fundacao da Linguistica Moderna: o Curso de Linguistica Geral . Com o intuito de apreender de que maneira o nome proprio e considerado nessa obra, priorizamos dois pontos principais: a negacao da nomenclatura e a unica mencao dessa categoria feita no CLG. Partimos do pressuposto de que, apesar de nao ser evidente, tanto a negacao da nomenclatura quanto os nomes proprios relacionam-se com aspectos importantes da teoria saussuriana, tais como: arbitrariedade do signo, valor e parole. The negation of nomenclature and the isolation of proper name In this work we aim to investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’s considerations about the linguistic cathegory of proper names, specifically in the work responsible by the foundation of Modern Linguistics: Course in General Linguistics . In order to comprehend in which way the proper name is considered in that work, we prioritize two main points: the denial of nomenclature and the single mention of this category made in the CGL. We start from the assumption that, although it is not evident, both the denial of nomenclature and the proper names are related with important aspects of Saussure’s theory, such as the arbitrariness of sign, the value and the speech. Keywords: Proper names. Ferdinand de Saussure. CLG. Arbitrariness DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172
对命名的否定和专有名称的孤立
在本文中,我们考察了索绪尔关于本体名词的语言范畴的思考,特别是在《现代语言学基础:一般语言学课程》一书中。为了理解本体名称是如何在这部作品中被考虑的,我们优先考虑了两个要点:对命名法的否定和CLG中对这一类别的唯一提及。我们假设,尽管不明显,但对命名法和专有名称的否定都与索绪尔理论的重要方面有关,如符号、价值和言语的随意性。命名法和隔离的negation适当的名字在这个工作我们的目标是investigate Ferdinand de Saussure’的‘关注语言的适当的名称,specifically cathegory工作负责任的现代语言学的基础:在普通语言学课程。为了了解在这项工作中考虑适当名称的方式,我们优先考虑两个主要问题:拒绝使用命名法和在《公约》中只提及这一类别。我们开始的假设,虽然它并不明显,拒绝命名和适当的名称与索绪尔的重要方面是相关的arbitrariness’的理论,这样的标志,价值和演讲。关键词:正确的名字。费迪南德·德·索绪尔。CLG。仲裁DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p152-172
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信