A comparison of back-end frameworks for web application development

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Marin Kaluža, Marijana Kalanj, B. Vukelić
{"title":"A comparison of back-end\nframeworks for web application development","authors":"Marin Kaluža, Marijana Kalanj, B. Vukelić","doi":"10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web applications have a complex structure, and for more efficient and faster writing of original program code, frameworks are often used. There are numerous different frameworks on the market that are used to build different parts of software architecture. Only back-end frameworks\nfor web applications development are analyzed. Previous research on evaluation criteria for back-end frameworks, and various sources which by various reasons, represent the list of popularity of back-end frameworks are shown. The framework selection procedure is described, and the reasons of framework selection (Laravel, Rails, Django and Spring) for the analysis are given. The examination (verification) and evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of the selected basic and additional comparison criteria in selected frameworks are carried out. The analysis shows insignificant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks according to the basic comparison criteria. According to the additional comparison criteria, the analysis shows significant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks. It is shown that the Django framework, because it is suitable for development of larger applications, suitable for beginner developers, and achieves the highest overall rating of additional comparison criteria, is the best choice of analyzed back-end frameworks for web application development.","PeriodicalId":40998,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Web applications have a complex structure, and for more efficient and faster writing of original program code, frameworks are often used. There are numerous different frameworks on the market that are used to build different parts of software architecture. Only back-end frameworks for web applications development are analyzed. Previous research on evaluation criteria for back-end frameworks, and various sources which by various reasons, represent the list of popularity of back-end frameworks are shown. The framework selection procedure is described, and the reasons of framework selection (Laravel, Rails, Django and Spring) for the analysis are given. The examination (verification) and evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of the selected basic and additional comparison criteria in selected frameworks are carried out. The analysis shows insignificant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks according to the basic comparison criteria. According to the additional comparison criteria, the analysis shows significant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks. It is shown that the Django framework, because it is suitable for development of larger applications, suitable for beginner developers, and achieves the highest overall rating of additional comparison criteria, is the best choice of analyzed back-end frameworks for web application development.
web应用程序开发后端框架的比较
Web应用程序具有复杂的结构,为了更高效、更快地编写原始程序代码,通常使用框架。市场上有许多不同的框架,用于构建软件体系结构的不同部分。本文只分析了web应用程序开发的后端框架。显示了以往对后端框架评价标准的研究,以及由于各种原因,代表后端框架受欢迎程度的各种来源。描述了框架的选择过程,并给出了框架选择的原因(Laravel, Rails, Django和Spring)进行分析。对选定框架中选定的基本标准和附加比较标准的满意程度进行检查(验证)和评价。分析表明,根据基本比较标准,所分析框架的总体评分差异不显著。根据附加的比较标准,分析显示所分析框架的总体评级存在显著差异。结果表明,由于Django框架适合开发大型应用程序,适合初学者开发,并且在附加比较标准中达到了最高的综合评分,因此是web应用程序开发分析后端框架的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信