Analyzing the bias in dry weather spot flow rates to periodical mean flow rates in mountain streams: toward determining water pollution loads and optimizing water sampling strategies

IF 0.6 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Ami Tanno, S. Harada
{"title":"Analyzing the bias in dry weather spot flow rates to periodical mean flow rates in mountain streams: toward determining water pollution loads and optimizing water sampling strategies","authors":"Ami Tanno, S. Harada","doi":"10.3178/HRL.15.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low frequency (once a month) but long-term (ca. 6 years) sampling including snow-melt periods in a moun‐ tainous stream, the Okura River (Sendai, Japan), revealed that loadings of 5 parameters (COD, TN, TP, TOC and DSiO2) could be expressed exponentially using discharge (Q), while the coefficients for the 5 loadings were all about 1. Here, mathematically, the periodically averaged Q leads to approximation of that of load (L). We analyzed the bias of the spot Q to that of the periodical (30, 14 and 8 days) means. The results ensured the utilization of the spot Q instead of the periodical mean Q for estimating L because of the high correlation factors (0.872, 0.914 and 0.923 on 30-, 14-, 8-day mean Q analyses, respectively) and sug‐ gested the validity of the usage of the observed regression slopes of 1.06, 1.22, and 1.22 over 30, 14, 8 days for quan‐ titative correction of L because the fact that the slopes are larger than 1 indicate that the usage of the spot Q instead of the mean Q leads to the overestimation of L. Both changing correlation factors and the regression slopes realized small improvements via shortening the periods from 14 to 8 days. The protocol proposed here is quite original and is applica‐ ble to designing sampling strategies at target sites based on quantification of the limitations and/or reliability of L esti‐ mations.","PeriodicalId":13111,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Research Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3178/HRL.15.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low frequency (once a month) but long-term (ca. 6 years) sampling including snow-melt periods in a moun‐ tainous stream, the Okura River (Sendai, Japan), revealed that loadings of 5 parameters (COD, TN, TP, TOC and DSiO2) could be expressed exponentially using discharge (Q), while the coefficients for the 5 loadings were all about 1. Here, mathematically, the periodically averaged Q leads to approximation of that of load (L). We analyzed the bias of the spot Q to that of the periodical (30, 14 and 8 days) means. The results ensured the utilization of the spot Q instead of the periodical mean Q for estimating L because of the high correlation factors (0.872, 0.914 and 0.923 on 30-, 14-, 8-day mean Q analyses, respectively) and sug‐ gested the validity of the usage of the observed regression slopes of 1.06, 1.22, and 1.22 over 30, 14, 8 days for quan‐ titative correction of L because the fact that the slopes are larger than 1 indicate that the usage of the spot Q instead of the mean Q leads to the overestimation of L. Both changing correlation factors and the regression slopes realized small improvements via shortening the periods from 14 to 8 days. The protocol proposed here is quite original and is applica‐ ble to designing sampling strategies at target sites based on quantification of the limitations and/or reliability of L esti‐ mations.
干旱期山溪现场流量对周期平均流量的偏差分析:确定水污染负荷和优化水采样策略
对日本仙台大仓河(Okura River)融雪期的低频率(1个月)和长期(约6年)采样结果表明,5个参数(COD、TN、TP、TOC和DSiO2)的负荷可以用流量(Q)指数表示,且5个负荷的系数都在1左右。在这里,从数学上讲,周期性平均Q导致了负荷(L)的近似。我们分析了现场Q对周期性(30,14和8天)平均值的偏差。由于高相关因子(30天、14天、8天平均Q分析分别为0.872、0.914和0.923),结果确保了利用现场Q而不是周期平均Q来估计L,并表明使用观察到的回归斜率1.06、1.22和1.22在30,14上的有效性。由于斜率大于1的事实表明,使用点Q而不是平均Q会导致L的高估,变化的相关因子和回归斜率通过缩短周期从14天到8天实现了小的改善。本文提出的方案非常新颖,适用于基于L估计的局限性和/或可靠性的量化来设计目标地点的采样策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Research Letters (HRL) is an international and trans-disciplinary electronic online journal published jointly by Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources (JSHWR), Japanese Association of Groundwater Hydrology (JAGH), Japanese Association of Hydrological Sciences (JAHS), and Japanese Society of Physical Hydrology (JSPH), aiming at rapid exchange and outgoing of information in these fields. The purpose is to disseminate original research findings and develop debates on a wide range of investigations on hydrology and water resources to researchers, students and the public. It also publishes reviews of various fields on hydrology and water resources and other information of interest to scientists to encourage communication and utilization of the published results. The editors welcome contributions from authors throughout the world. The decision on acceptance of a submitted manuscript is made by the journal editors on the basis of suitability of subject matter to the scope of the journal, originality of the contribution, potential impacts on societies and scientific merit. Manuscripts submitted to HRL may cover all aspects of hydrology and water resources, including research on physical and biological sciences, engineering, and social and political sciences from the aspects of hydrology and water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信