{"title":"“We Are All Flying into the Abyss”: Correspondence of F. D. Batyushkov, L. V. Sobinov, and A. I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin in November – December 1917","authors":"P. Gordeev","doi":"10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-86-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fonds of the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art and in the Manuscript Department of the Institute of Russian Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences there is stored correspondence of F. D. Batyushkov (who on the days of the revolution held the position of the chief commissioner for state theaters) with commissioners for the Moscow Bolshoi and Maly Theaters L. V. Sobinov and A. I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin over November and December 1917. These letters, most of which haven’t been published previously or introduced into scientific use, show the attitude of the leaders of the Department of Theatres to the Bolsheviks coming to power and to the prospect of cooperation with them. All three correspondents assessed the October Revolution negatively and spoke of their possible resignation (Batyushkov most definitely, Sobinov and Yuzhin with some reservations), but later serious discrepancies emerged in their personal strategies. Batyushkov was an implacable opponent of the Soviet government, rejecting all cooperation with the “terrorists” Bolsheviks and their representative, People's Commissar of Education A. V. Lunacharsky. On these grounds, he wanted to rally the Department of Theatres, at the head of which he stood. Positions of Yuzhin and Sobinov were more complicated. Yuzhin, who headed the Maly Theatre, shared Batyushkov's critical view of the “dominant party,” moreover, he was outraged and shocked by the pogrom of the Maly Theater by the Red Guards during street fighting in Moscow. However, his whole life was dedicated to the Maly Theater and he doubted whether he had the moral right to leave his position at such a crucial moment. Sobinov, on the other hand, was never able to overcome his personal dislike for Batyushkov (formed long before the October Revolution in disputes over the “autonomous” rights of Moscow theaters and their heads). In the emergency of November – December 1917, when the Bolsheviks established their control over banks and money transfers were extremely difficult, Sobinov did not want to put himself in the chief commissioner’s shoes and blamed him for the lack of money for the Bolshoi Theater. In December 1917, when A. V. Lunacharsky began a direct attack on Batyushkov's position in the Department of Theatres, the Petrograd state theaters expressed their support to Batyushkov. In Moscow, the situation was different: because of Sobinov's grievance with the chief commissioner and Yuzhin's attempts to coordinate his position with Sobinov, the Bolshoi and Maly Theaters did not unequivocally declare their confidence in Batyushkov, weakening the latter’s position in his conflict with Lunacharsky. The correspondence of Batyushkov, Sobinov, and Yuzhin over November – December 1917 is an important source on history of the Russian theater, as well as for studying the period of the so-called “sabotage” of civil servants after the October Revolution.","PeriodicalId":41551,"journal":{"name":"Herald of an Archivist","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of an Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-86-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the fonds of the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art and in the Manuscript Department of the Institute of Russian Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences there is stored correspondence of F. D. Batyushkov (who on the days of the revolution held the position of the chief commissioner for state theaters) with commissioners for the Moscow Bolshoi and Maly Theaters L. V. Sobinov and A. I. Sumbatov-Yuzhin over November and December 1917. These letters, most of which haven’t been published previously or introduced into scientific use, show the attitude of the leaders of the Department of Theatres to the Bolsheviks coming to power and to the prospect of cooperation with them. All three correspondents assessed the October Revolution negatively and spoke of their possible resignation (Batyushkov most definitely, Sobinov and Yuzhin with some reservations), but later serious discrepancies emerged in their personal strategies. Batyushkov was an implacable opponent of the Soviet government, rejecting all cooperation with the “terrorists” Bolsheviks and their representative, People's Commissar of Education A. V. Lunacharsky. On these grounds, he wanted to rally the Department of Theatres, at the head of which he stood. Positions of Yuzhin and Sobinov were more complicated. Yuzhin, who headed the Maly Theatre, shared Batyushkov's critical view of the “dominant party,” moreover, he was outraged and shocked by the pogrom of the Maly Theater by the Red Guards during street fighting in Moscow. However, his whole life was dedicated to the Maly Theater and he doubted whether he had the moral right to leave his position at such a crucial moment. Sobinov, on the other hand, was never able to overcome his personal dislike for Batyushkov (formed long before the October Revolution in disputes over the “autonomous” rights of Moscow theaters and their heads). In the emergency of November – December 1917, when the Bolsheviks established their control over banks and money transfers were extremely difficult, Sobinov did not want to put himself in the chief commissioner’s shoes and blamed him for the lack of money for the Bolshoi Theater. In December 1917, when A. V. Lunacharsky began a direct attack on Batyushkov's position in the Department of Theatres, the Petrograd state theaters expressed their support to Batyushkov. In Moscow, the situation was different: because of Sobinov's grievance with the chief commissioner and Yuzhin's attempts to coordinate his position with Sobinov, the Bolshoi and Maly Theaters did not unequivocally declare their confidence in Batyushkov, weakening the latter’s position in his conflict with Lunacharsky. The correspondence of Batyushkov, Sobinov, and Yuzhin over November – December 1917 is an important source on history of the Russian theater, as well as for studying the period of the so-called “sabotage” of civil servants after the October Revolution.
在俄罗斯国家文学艺术档案馆和俄罗斯科学院俄罗斯文学研究所的手稿部,存放着f·d·巴图什科夫(他在革命时期担任国家剧院的首席专员)与莫斯科大剧院和马利剧院的专员l·v·索比诺夫和a·i·松巴托夫-尤任1917年11月和12月的通信。这些信件大部分以前没有发表过,也没有被引入科学研究,它们表明了戏剧部领导人对布尔什维克上台以及与他们合作前景的态度。三位记者对十月革命的评价都是负面的,并谈到了他们可能辞职的可能性(巴图什科夫最肯定,索比诺夫和尤任有一些保留意见),但后来他们的个人策略出现了严重的差异。巴图什科夫是苏维埃政府的坚定反对者,拒绝与“恐怖分子”布尔什维克及其代表、教育人民委员a·v·卢纳恰尔斯基(A. V. Lunacharsky)合作。基于这些理由,他想召集戏剧系,他是戏剧系的领导。余任和索比诺夫的情况更为复杂。作为马利剧院的负责人,Yuzhin和Batyushkov一样,对“执政党”持批判态度。此外,他对莫斯科街头战斗中红卫兵对马利剧院的大屠杀感到愤怒和震惊。然而,他的一生都奉献给了马利剧院,他怀疑自己是否有道德权利在如此关键的时刻离开自己的位置。另一方面,索比诺夫从来没有能够克服他对巴图什科夫的个人厌恶(早在十月革命之前,莫斯科剧院及其负责人的“自治”权利的争议就形成了这种厌恶)。在1917年11月至12月的紧急情况下,当布尔什维克建立了对银行的控制,资金转移极其困难时,索比诺夫不想把自己放在首席专员的位置上,并将莫斯科大剧院的资金短缺归咎于他。1917年12月,当a·v·卢纳恰尔斯基(a . V. Lunacharsky)开始直接攻击巴图什科夫在剧院部的地位时,彼得格勒州剧院表达了对巴图什科夫的支持。在莫斯科,情况就不同了:由于索比诺夫对首席专员的不满,以及尤任试图与索比诺夫协调他的立场,莫斯科大剧院和马里剧院没有明确宣布他们对巴图什科夫的信任,削弱了后者在与卢纳查尔斯基的冲突中的地位。巴图什科夫、索比诺夫和尤任在1917年11月至12月间的通信是研究俄国戏剧史的重要资料,也是研究十月革命后所谓的“破坏”公务员时期的重要资料。