Peasants Divorcing Adulteresses in 1863–1917: Specifics, Difficulties, Results

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
A. Spichak, Olesya V. Vanyushina, Julia A. Krivosheeva
{"title":"Peasants Divorcing Adulteresses in 1863–1917: Specifics, Difficulties, Results","authors":"A. Spichak, Olesya V. Vanyushina, Julia A. Krivosheeva","doi":"10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-262-274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of divorce cases initiated by men from the peasant class following adultery of their wives. The study is to identify specifics, common and distinctive features of peasant marriages dissolution caused by female adultery in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century in the Yaroslavl, Tver, and Tobolsk spiritual consistories. The source base is previously unknown archival materials from the State Archive of the Yaroslavl Region, State Archive of the Tver Region, and State Archive in Tobolsk. Documents stored in the state archives indicate the existence of a mandatory package of documents established by law, fees for opening a case, requirements for the evidence base, and established stages in office work. Comparative analysis of archival documents shows that women's infidelity was the most frequent reason of peasants requesting divorce in the spiritual consistories in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century. However, adultery was the most difficult to prove motive, making it almost impossible to get a divorce. Studying the papers of spiritual consistories permits to distinguish many degrees of the crime: one-time adultery, constant adultery, elopement, extramarital cohabitation, prostitution. Women’s actions were caused by resentment, beatings (on the part of husbands or mothers-in-law), or by forced marriages. The main difficulties in obtaining divorce among peasants were the same: difficulty of proving the birth of an illegitimate child and finding eyewitnesses, ignorance of the wife's place of residence. On the periphery in the Tobolsk gubernia with its large territories and lack of competent employees, the divorce action was hindered by priests’ incorrect paperwork and loss of documents in the mail. The relevance of the study is due to the current acute social problems (population decline, above all) caused by large number of family breakups. Turning to the history of divorce proceedings and methods of reconciling spouses (admonition by parish priests, mostly) can be useful for rethinking solving and preventing marital conflicts, as well as for revealing certain aspects of the history of institutions office work.","PeriodicalId":41551,"journal":{"name":"Herald of an Archivist","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of an Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-262-274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of divorce cases initiated by men from the peasant class following adultery of their wives. The study is to identify specifics, common and distinctive features of peasant marriages dissolution caused by female adultery in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century in the Yaroslavl, Tver, and Tobolsk spiritual consistories. The source base is previously unknown archival materials from the State Archive of the Yaroslavl Region, State Archive of the Tver Region, and State Archive in Tobolsk. Documents stored in the state archives indicate the existence of a mandatory package of documents established by law, fees for opening a case, requirements for the evidence base, and established stages in office work. Comparative analysis of archival documents shows that women's infidelity was the most frequent reason of peasants requesting divorce in the spiritual consistories in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century. However, adultery was the most difficult to prove motive, making it almost impossible to get a divorce. Studying the papers of spiritual consistories permits to distinguish many degrees of the crime: one-time adultery, constant adultery, elopement, extramarital cohabitation, prostitution. Women’s actions were caused by resentment, beatings (on the part of husbands or mothers-in-law), or by forced marriages. The main difficulties in obtaining divorce among peasants were the same: difficulty of proving the birth of an illegitimate child and finding eyewitnesses, ignorance of the wife's place of residence. On the periphery in the Tobolsk gubernia with its large territories and lack of competent employees, the divorce action was hindered by priests’ incorrect paperwork and loss of documents in the mail. The relevance of the study is due to the current acute social problems (population decline, above all) caused by large number of family breakups. Turning to the history of divorce proceedings and methods of reconciling spouses (admonition by parish priests, mostly) can be useful for rethinking solving and preventing marital conflicts, as well as for revealing certain aspects of the history of institutions office work.
1863-1917年农民与奸妇离婚:细节、困难与结果
本文研究的是农民阶级男子在妻子通奸后提出的离婚案件。本研究旨在找出19世纪下半叶至20世纪初雅罗斯拉夫尔、特维尔和托博尔斯克宗教团体中因女性通奸而导致农民婚姻破裂的特殊性、共性和鲜明特征。来源基础是以前未知的档案材料,来自雅罗斯拉夫尔地区国家档案馆,特维尔地区国家档案馆和托博尔斯克国家档案馆。国家档案中保存的文件表明,存在法律规定的强制性文件包、开案费用、证据基础要求和办公室工作规定的阶段。档案资料的比较分析表明,在19世纪下半叶至20世纪初的精神群体中,女性的不忠是农民提出离婚的最常见原因。然而,通奸是最难以证明的动机,这使得离婚几乎不可能。研究精神伴侣的论文,可以区分多种程度的犯罪:一次性通奸、经常性通奸、私奔、婚外同居、卖淫。妇女的行为是由怨恨、(丈夫或婆婆的)殴打或强迫婚姻引起的。农民离婚的主要困难是相同的:难以证明私生子的出生和寻找目击证人,不知道妻子的居住地。在托博尔斯克省的边缘地区,由于领土辽阔,缺乏称职的雇员,离婚诉讼受到牧师错误的文书工作和邮件中文件丢失的阻碍。这项研究的相关性是由于当前严重的社会问题(人口下降,首先)造成大量的家庭破裂。回顾离婚诉讼的历史和夫妻和解的方法(主要是教区牧师的训诫),有助于重新思考如何解决和预防婚姻冲突,也有助于揭示机构办公室工作历史的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信