Beyond Economic Fatherhood: Encouraging Divorced Fathers to Parent

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
S. Maldonado
{"title":"Beyond Economic Fatherhood: Encouraging Divorced Fathers to Parent","authors":"S. Maldonado","doi":"10.2307/4150643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Article, Professor Maldonado examines the extensive empirical evidence of paternal disengagement and analyses the reasons close to one-third of noncustodial fathers have little or no contact with their children after divorce. Exploring current societal norms of post-divorce fatherhood, she concludes that the law's and society's treatment and expectations of divorced fathers may be facilitating their disengagement. Drawing on the rich scholarship on the law's effect on social norms of littering, recycling, sexual harassment, and marital commitment, among others, she argues that the law has the ability to trigger a social norm of involved fatherhood after divorce, thereby encouraging fathers to remain a part of their children's lives. She proposes that states adopt a presumption of joint legal custody AND require that nonresidential fathers participate in their children's upbringing. Relying on norm theorists' framework for determining how social norms arise, Professor Maldonado rejects legal enforcement of mandatory parenting rules in favor of informal external and internal sanctions. She argues that as a result of the law's expressive function, these legal reforms will signal to fathers and their communities that fatherhood is an important and expected responsibility, not an option, and that good parents nurture their children. In short time, communities would informally enforce paternal involvement rules by shaming those fathers who violate the norm. Further, these legal reforms might also have a self-sanctioning effect as many fathers would internalize the legal rule and experience guilt if they failed to participate in their children's upbringing because it would signify, both externally and internally, that they are bad parents. Thus, even absent external enforcement, fewer fathers would abandon their children after divorce.","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"153 1","pages":"921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4150643","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4150643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

In this Article, Professor Maldonado examines the extensive empirical evidence of paternal disengagement and analyses the reasons close to one-third of noncustodial fathers have little or no contact with their children after divorce. Exploring current societal norms of post-divorce fatherhood, she concludes that the law's and society's treatment and expectations of divorced fathers may be facilitating their disengagement. Drawing on the rich scholarship on the law's effect on social norms of littering, recycling, sexual harassment, and marital commitment, among others, she argues that the law has the ability to trigger a social norm of involved fatherhood after divorce, thereby encouraging fathers to remain a part of their children's lives. She proposes that states adopt a presumption of joint legal custody AND require that nonresidential fathers participate in their children's upbringing. Relying on norm theorists' framework for determining how social norms arise, Professor Maldonado rejects legal enforcement of mandatory parenting rules in favor of informal external and internal sanctions. She argues that as a result of the law's expressive function, these legal reforms will signal to fathers and their communities that fatherhood is an important and expected responsibility, not an option, and that good parents nurture their children. In short time, communities would informally enforce paternal involvement rules by shaming those fathers who violate the norm. Further, these legal reforms might also have a self-sanctioning effect as many fathers would internalize the legal rule and experience guilt if they failed to participate in their children's upbringing because it would signify, both externally and internally, that they are bad parents. Thus, even absent external enforcement, fewer fathers would abandon their children after divorce.
超越经济父亲:鼓励离婚父亲为人父母
在这篇文章中,Maldonado教授考察了大量关于父亲脱离参与的经验证据,并分析了近三分之一的无监护权父亲在离婚后很少或根本没有与孩子联系的原因。通过对当前离婚后父亲身份的社会规范的研究,她得出结论,法律和社会对离婚父亲的对待和期望可能会促进他们的脱离。利用大量关于法律对乱扔垃圾、循环利用、性骚扰和婚姻承诺等社会规范影响的研究成果,她认为,法律有能力在离婚后触发一种参与式父亲的社会规范,从而鼓励父亲继续参与孩子的生活。她建议各州采用共同法律监护的假设,并要求非居住父亲参与孩子的抚养。依靠规范理论家的框架来确定社会规范是如何产生的,马尔多纳多教授反对强制性育儿规则的法律执行,赞成非正式的外部和内部制裁。她认为,由于法律的表达功能,这些法律改革将向父亲和他们的社区发出信号,表明做父亲是一项重要的、被期待的责任,而不是一种选择,好的父母会养育孩子。在短时间内,社区会通过羞辱那些违反规范的父亲来非正式地执行父亲参与规则。此外,这些法律改革也可能有自我制裁的效果,因为许多父亲会内化法律规则,如果他们没有参与孩子的抚养,就会感到内疚,因为这在外部和内部都意味着他们是糟糕的父母。因此,即使没有外部强制措施,离婚后抛弃孩子的父亲也会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信