Latinos, Anglos, Voters, Candidates, and Voting Rights

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
Jonathan Nagler, R. M. Alvarez
{"title":"Latinos, Anglos, Voters, Candidates, and Voting Rights","authors":"Jonathan Nagler, R. M. Alvarez","doi":"10.2307/4150628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we contrast the demographics, political preferences, and voting behavior of Latinos and Anglos. In doing so, we focus particularly on California because of the large quantity of economic, demographic, and political data concerning Latinos that are available for that state. Also, restricting ourselves to Latinos in California avoids the “problem” of cross-state diversity. We demonstrate that there is remarkable diversity among Latinos within California. Were we to add the Hispanic populations of other states to our analysis, particularly Cubans in Florida and Puerto Ricans in New York, we would magnify this diversity considerably. The purpose of our research is to provide suitable factual material for determining whether or not Latinos can constitute a “community of interest.” We do not offer a new theory of “community of interest” here. But we think that a community of interest must be based more on shared preferences than on political outcomes (where “political outcomes” can be policy choices or candidates running for office).","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"153 1","pages":"393-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4150628","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4150628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper we contrast the demographics, political preferences, and voting behavior of Latinos and Anglos. In doing so, we focus particularly on California because of the large quantity of economic, demographic, and political data concerning Latinos that are available for that state. Also, restricting ourselves to Latinos in California avoids the “problem” of cross-state diversity. We demonstrate that there is remarkable diversity among Latinos within California. Were we to add the Hispanic populations of other states to our analysis, particularly Cubans in Florida and Puerto Ricans in New York, we would magnify this diversity considerably. The purpose of our research is to provide suitable factual material for determining whether or not Latinos can constitute a “community of interest.” We do not offer a new theory of “community of interest” here. But we think that a community of interest must be based more on shared preferences than on political outcomes (where “political outcomes” can be policy choices or candidates running for office).
拉丁美洲人、盎格鲁人、选民、候选人和投票权
在本文中,我们对比了拉丁裔和盎格鲁裔的人口统计、政治偏好和投票行为。在此过程中,我们特别关注加州,因为该州有大量与拉美裔有关的经济、人口和政治数据。此外,把加州的拉美裔限制在自己的范围内,可以避免跨州多样性的“问题”。我们证明了加州的拉丁美洲人之间存在着显著的多样性。如果我们把其他州的西班牙裔人口也加入到我们的分析中,特别是佛罗里达的古巴人和纽约的波多黎各人,我们会大大扩大这种多样性。我们研究的目的是提供合适的事实材料,以确定拉丁美洲人是否可以构成一个“利益共同体”。我们在这里并没有提出一个新的“利益共同体”理论。但我们认为,利益共同体必须更多地基于共同偏好,而不是政治结果(这里的“政治结果”可以是政策选择或候选人竞选)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信