Partner supportive dyadic coping and relationship stability among parents of children with autism spectrum disorder

Q4 Social Sciences
Ajana Löw
{"title":"Partner supportive dyadic coping and relationship stability among parents of children with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Ajana Löw","doi":"10.31299/hrri.57.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies involving parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have reported negative relationship outcomes for some couples and positive for others, indicating the need to determine the moderators of the link between stress and divorce. This study aims to examine the moderating effect of partner supportive dyadic coping, i.e., interpersonal coping that involves providing comfort, empathy, or practical advice to one’s partner, on the association between parental stress and relationship stability among parents of children with ASD. The study was conducted on a sample of parents (N=89) who met the criteria of being in a relationship and parenting at least one child diagnosed with ASD. The questionnaire included the Parental Stress Scale, a subscale of the Dyadic Coping Inventory, an item assessing the potential for divorce, and sociodemographic variables. The logistic regression analysis model explained a substantial amount of the variance of relationship stability. Higher probability of having a stable relationship was associated with lower levels of parental stress and higher levels of supportive dyadic coping. Additionally, supportive dyadic coping buffered the negative effect of parental stress: the effect of stress on relationship stability was evident only among participants whose partners showed low supportive dyadic coping. The results indicate that a relationship does not necessarily end in divorce when a couple experiences stressful circumstances, such as raising a child with ASD. The key factor could be supportive dyadic coping that prevents negative effects of stress on relationship maintenance. Support services should aim to enhance supportive dyadic coping skills among parents, and advocate for the fact that both stress and coping are joint processes of partners in a relationship.","PeriodicalId":39824,"journal":{"name":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.57.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies involving parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have reported negative relationship outcomes for some couples and positive for others, indicating the need to determine the moderators of the link between stress and divorce. This study aims to examine the moderating effect of partner supportive dyadic coping, i.e., interpersonal coping that involves providing comfort, empathy, or practical advice to one’s partner, on the association between parental stress and relationship stability among parents of children with ASD. The study was conducted on a sample of parents (N=89) who met the criteria of being in a relationship and parenting at least one child diagnosed with ASD. The questionnaire included the Parental Stress Scale, a subscale of the Dyadic Coping Inventory, an item assessing the potential for divorce, and sociodemographic variables. The logistic regression analysis model explained a substantial amount of the variance of relationship stability. Higher probability of having a stable relationship was associated with lower levels of parental stress and higher levels of supportive dyadic coping. Additionally, supportive dyadic coping buffered the negative effect of parental stress: the effect of stress on relationship stability was evident only among participants whose partners showed low supportive dyadic coping. The results indicate that a relationship does not necessarily end in divorce when a couple experiences stressful circumstances, such as raising a child with ASD. The key factor could be supportive dyadic coping that prevents negative effects of stress on relationship maintenance. Support services should aim to enhance supportive dyadic coping skills among parents, and advocate for the fact that both stress and coping are joint processes of partners in a relationship.
自闭症谱系障碍儿童父母的伴侣支持型二元应对与关系稳定性
涉及自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童父母的研究报告称,一些夫妇的关系结果是消极的,而另一些则是积极的,这表明有必要确定压力和离婚之间联系的调节因素。本研究旨在探讨自闭症儿童父母的父母压力与关系稳定性之间的关系,以及伴侣支持性二元应对(即向伴侣提供安慰、共情或实用建议的人际应对)的调节作用。这项研究是在一组父母(N=89)的样本中进行的,他们符合恋爱关系和养育至少一个被诊断患有自闭症的孩子的标准。问卷包括父母压力量表,一个二元应对量表的子量表,一个评估离婚可能性的项目,以及社会人口变量。逻辑回归分析模型解释了关系稳定性的大量方差。拥有稳定关系的可能性越大,父母压力水平越低,支持性二元应对水平越高。此外,支持性二元应对可以缓冲父母压力的负面影响:压力对关系稳定性的影响仅在伴侣表现出低支持性二元应对的参与者中才明显。研究结果表明,当一对夫妇经历压力环境(比如抚养一个患有自闭症的孩子)时,一段关系并不一定以离婚告终。关键因素可能是支持性的二元应对,以防止压力对关系维持的负面影响。支持服务的目标应该是增强父母之间相互支持的应对技能,并倡导这样一个事实,即压力和应对都是关系中伴侣的共同过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, sljednik časopisa Defektologija, objavljuje radove iz područja edukacijsko-rehabilitacijskih, biomedicinskih, humanističkih, te drugih društvenih znanosti, kao i različitih područja umjetnosti povezanih s pitanjima prevencije, dijagnostike i procjene, tretmana i sveobuhvatne podrške u zajednici za osobe s posebnim potrebama i poremećajima u ponašanju. Primarno je usmjerena na objavljivanje suvremenih znanstvenih i stručnih spoznaja.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信