Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Robert Stefanicki
{"title":"Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy","authors":"Robert Stefanicki","doi":"10.31268/ps.2023.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The justification of judicial decisions is an important research segment of jurisprudence and, at the same time, a very useful instrument in practice, with multiple – constantly discovered, not fully recognised and valued functions. First of all, it is, as a rule, an inseparable element of a judicial decision and a component of a fair trial. Its jurisprudential functions naturally come to the fore. In the considerations undertaken, emphasis is placed on the multilateral determinants and changing paradigms of legal culture. Judicial jurisprudence remains an inherent part of it. The presented material captures the theme of the evolution that is taking place in the model of law – from an autonomous idea, through a closed concept, to a model of law in which facts are relevant. Social changes, characterised by responsiveness in the approach to the interpretation and application of law, are also described.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2023.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The justification of judicial decisions is an important research segment of jurisprudence and, at the same time, a very useful instrument in practice, with multiple – constantly discovered, not fully recognised and valued functions. First of all, it is, as a rule, an inseparable element of a judicial decision and a component of a fair trial. Its jurisprudential functions naturally come to the fore. In the considerations undertaken, emphasis is placed on the multilateral determinants and changing paradigms of legal culture. Judicial jurisprudence remains an inherent part of it. The presented material captures the theme of the evolution that is taking place in the model of law – from an autonomous idea, through a closed concept, to a model of law in which facts are relevant. Social changes, characterised by responsiveness in the approach to the interpretation and application of law, are also described.
法院裁决的正当性——选定的问题
司法判决的正当性是法理学的一个重要研究领域,同时也是实践中非常有用的工具,具有多种不断被发现、尚未被充分认识和重视的功能。首先,它通常是司法决定的一个不可分割的因素和公平审判的一个组成部分。其法理功能自然凸显。在进行的审议中,重点放在法律文化的多边决定因素和不断变化的范例上。司法法学仍然是其固有的一部分。所呈现的材料抓住了正在法律模式中发生的演变的主题-从一个自主的想法,通过一个封闭的概念,到一个事实相关的法律模式。还描述了社会变化,其特点是在解释和适用法律的方法上作出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信