Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Krzysztof Olszak
{"title":"Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału","authors":"Krzysztof Olszak","doi":"10.31268/ps.2023.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented article is devoted to the issue of admissibility of an appeal to a court against the transfer of a judge by a decision of the president of a court from one division to another division. The current statutory regulation, which does not provide for the possibility of an appeal to a court in every case of such a transfer, does not seem to be in line with the considerations made in the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgement of 6 October 2021 in case C-487/19, hence it is necessary to determine their relevance for jurisprudence in Poland and to juxtapose those considerations with, i.a., the previous jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal, taking into account the issue of judicial independence and the right to a court.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2023.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presented article is devoted to the issue of admissibility of an appeal to a court against the transfer of a judge by a decision of the president of a court from one division to another division. The current statutory regulation, which does not provide for the possibility of an appeal to a court in every case of such a transfer, does not seem to be in line with the considerations made in the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgement of 6 October 2021 in case C-487/19, hence it is necessary to determine their relevance for jurisprudence in Poland and to juxtapose those considerations with, i.a., the previous jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal, taking into account the issue of judicial independence and the right to a court.
法官调任其他部门案件中对国家司法委员会决议的上诉可否受理
本条款专门讨论针对法院院长决定将一名法官从一个审判庭调往另一个审判庭而向法院提出的上诉的可受理性问题。当前法定监管,不提供到法院上诉的可能性在每个此类转移的情况下,似乎不符合事项欧盟法院的审判2021年10月6日C-487/19,因此它是必要的,以确定他们的相关性法学在波兰和并列这些考虑,一、,前面的宪法法庭的法律体系,考虑到司法独立和诉诸法院的权利问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信