Ograniczanie czy obrona wolności słowa? Rozważania na temat koncepcji regulacji dotyczącej działalności mediów społecznościowych

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Ewa Milczarek
{"title":"Ograniczanie czy obrona wolności słowa? Rozważania na temat koncepcji regulacji dotyczącej działalności mediów społecznościowych","authors":"Ewa Milczarek","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of expression is an element of a democratic state of law. It enables obtaining information and opinions on the activities of state authorities as well as social organisations and private entities. So far, it has functioned in a civic-state relationship, protecting society against excessive censorship by those in power. Currently, it is also becoming a tool for protecting network users from corporations managing social media. In this context, two important issues need to be considered. Firstly, whether restricting freedom of speech by social media platforms or certain individuals (preventing publication of certain content) is consistent with the applicable law. Secondly, is a possible law regulating these issues a step towards protecting freedom of speech or a tool for its restriction? The aim of the article is therefore to answer the following research question: whether and in what form content shared on social media should be regulated. To this end, the author analyses whether social-media can now be considered a public place and what implications are associated with such an assessment. The impact of the new environment – the Internet – on freedom of speech was also analysed in the context of the necessity to establish a separate regulation protecting this value.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freedom of expression is an element of a democratic state of law. It enables obtaining information and opinions on the activities of state authorities as well as social organisations and private entities. So far, it has functioned in a civic-state relationship, protecting society against excessive censorship by those in power. Currently, it is also becoming a tool for protecting network users from corporations managing social media. In this context, two important issues need to be considered. Firstly, whether restricting freedom of speech by social media platforms or certain individuals (preventing publication of certain content) is consistent with the applicable law. Secondly, is a possible law regulating these issues a step towards protecting freedom of speech or a tool for its restriction? The aim of the article is therefore to answer the following research question: whether and in what form content shared on social media should be regulated. To this end, the author analyses whether social-media can now be considered a public place and what implications are associated with such an assessment. The impact of the new environment – the Internet – on freedom of speech was also analysed in the context of the necessity to establish a separate regulation protecting this value.
限制还是捍卫言论自由?对社交媒体活动监管概念的思考
言论自由是民主法治国家的一个要素。它使人们能够获得关于国家当局以及社会组织和私营实体活动的信息和意见。到目前为止,它一直在公民国家关系中发挥作用,保护社会免受当权者的过度审查。目前,它也正在成为保护网络用户免受企业管理社交媒体的工具。在这方面,需要考虑两个重要问题。首先,限制社交媒体平台或某些个人的言论自由(阻止某些内容的发布)是否符合适用法律。其次,监管这些问题的可能的法律是迈向保护言论自由的一步,还是限制言论自由的工具?因此,本文的目的是回答以下研究问题:社交媒体上分享的内容是否应该受到监管,以及以何种形式受到监管。为此,作者分析了社交媒体现在是否可以被视为公共场所,以及与这种评估相关的含义。还分析了新环境- -互联网- -对言论自由的影响,认为有必要制定保护这一价值的单独法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信