Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification

Q2 Environmental Science

Landscape Online Pub Date : 2014-06-02 DOI:10.3097/LO.201434

Benjamin Burkhard, Marion Kandziora, Ying Hou, F. Müller

{"title":"Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification","authors":"Benjamin Burkhard, Marion Kandziora, Ying Hou, F. Müller","doi":"10.3097/LO.201434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":38803,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Online","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3097/LO.201434","citationCount":"544","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 544

Abstract

The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生态系统服务潜力、流量和需求——空间定位、指示和量化的概念

多种多样的生态系统服务分类系统、评估框架、指标、量化方法和空间定位方法使科学家和决策者能够利用经验、数据、方法和工具。另一方面，科学家之间的各种概念和分歧阻碍了生态系统服务与当代环境管理和决策的整合。本文回顾和讨论了生态系统服务科学在空间定位、多种生态系统服务供给和需求的指示和量化方面的最新进展。提供了调节、供应和文化生态系统服务定义的概念和表格，区分生态系统服务潜在供应(存量)、流量(实际供应)和需求，以及量化的相关指标。进一步阐述了服务单位、受益区域、空间关系、竞争关系、时空尺度等空间概念。最后，提供了将CORINE土地覆盖类型与生态系统服务潜力、流量、需求和预算估算联系起来的矩阵。结果表明，景观的生态系统服务潜力不同于流量，特别是在提供生态系统服务方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Landscape Online Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： Landscape Online focuses on studies dealing with landscape research. The subject matter deals with any scientific, educational or applied aspect of processes, dynamics, indicators, controllers and visions related to landscapes. Furthermore, Landscape Online emphasizes the coupling of societal and natural systems, not only the involvement of human impact on landscape systems but also human perception of the landscape, its values and the evaluation of landscapes. Moreover, articles are appropriate that deal with landscape theory, system approaches and conceptual models of landscape, both their improvement and their discussion. Papers may be undisciplinary or multidisciplinary but have interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary appeal. All kinds of articles or parts of it must not be published beforehand in another journal