Fatalism, Foreknowledge and Free Will

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Madhu Mangal Chaturvedi
{"title":"Fatalism, Foreknowledge and Free Will","authors":"Madhu Mangal Chaturvedi","doi":"10.31337/oz.77.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the concept of divine Foreknowledge is not inconsistent with the denial of fatalism. From the finite perspective of us humans, it might appear that fatalism necessarily follows from the idea of an all-knowing God. However, from an all-knowing and all-powerful God’s point of view, assuming that such a Being exists for the sake of argument, divine Foreknowledge does not necessarily imply fatalism for us. Moreover, to deny that an all-knowing God could be wrong about our future is to make an inconsistent claim. Divine Foreknowledge means that God has infallible Knowledge about our future, and that must be fixed. However, I argue that the denial of fatalism is not inconsistent with God’s Omniscience when combined with some of His other attributes. For instance, a combination of divine Foreknowledge, Omnipotence and Free Will. In other words, God knows the future, but He is not limited to knowing the same future. For God can will the future to be quite different from what He knows it to be. That is to say, with respect to us, God’s Free Will is consistent with the negation of fatalism. The last claim also implies that there is space for human free will in between God’s Foreknowledge and Free Will.","PeriodicalId":38625,"journal":{"name":"Obnovljeni Zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obnovljeni Zivot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31337/oz.77.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper argues that the concept of divine Foreknowledge is not inconsistent with the denial of fatalism. From the finite perspective of us humans, it might appear that fatalism necessarily follows from the idea of an all-knowing God. However, from an all-knowing and all-powerful God’s point of view, assuming that such a Being exists for the sake of argument, divine Foreknowledge does not necessarily imply fatalism for us. Moreover, to deny that an all-knowing God could be wrong about our future is to make an inconsistent claim. Divine Foreknowledge means that God has infallible Knowledge about our future, and that must be fixed. However, I argue that the denial of fatalism is not inconsistent with God’s Omniscience when combined with some of His other attributes. For instance, a combination of divine Foreknowledge, Omnipotence and Free Will. In other words, God knows the future, but He is not limited to knowing the same future. For God can will the future to be quite different from what He knows it to be. That is to say, with respect to us, God’s Free Will is consistent with the negation of fatalism. The last claim also implies that there is space for human free will in between God’s Foreknowledge and Free Will.
宿命论,预知和自由意志
本文认为,神性预知的概念与对宿命论的否定并不矛盾。从我们人类有限的角度来看,宿命论似乎必然遵循全知上帝的观念。然而,从一个全知和全能的上帝的观点来看,假设这样一个存在是为了争论的缘故,神圣的预知并不一定意味着我们的宿命论。此外,否认无所不知的上帝对我们的未来可能是错误的,是一种前后矛盾的主张。神的预知意味着神对我们的未来有准确无误的认识,这一点必须被确定。然而,我认为否认宿命论与上帝的无所不知结合在一起时并不矛盾。例如,神的预知、全能和自由意志的结合。换句话说,神知道未来,但他并不局限于知道同样的未来。因为神能将未来与他所知道的完全不同。也就是说,就我们而言,上帝的自由意志与宿命论的否定是一致的。最后一种说法还暗示,在上帝的预知和自由意志之间存在人类自由意志的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obnovljeni Zivot
Obnovljeni Zivot Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信