Mean Sea Level Variability of the Oman Sea and its response to monsoon and the North Atlantic Oscillation index from Tide Gauge measurements

S. Hassanzadeh, F. Hosseinibalam
{"title":"Mean Sea Level Variability of the Oman Sea and its response to monsoon and the North Atlantic Oscillation index from Tide Gauge measurements","authors":"S. Hassanzadeh, F. Hosseinibalam","doi":"10.24200/JAMS.VOL26ISS1PP37-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sea level analysis along the Northern Coast of the Oman Sea has been investigated on the basis of tide gauge measurements. Meteorological parameters, along with monsoon and NAO indices are used to study the response of sea level to local and global forcing.  The relation between sea level and forces are examined. The low correlation coefficient (-0.35) between sea level and atmospheric pressure at Chabahar indicates that the response to atmospheric pressure is not an inverse barometric. The nature of local inverse barometric effects are examined through a series of statistical models. Analysis between sea level and atmospheric pressure reveals a significant coherence, which means that the Oman Sea mean level responds to atmospheric pressure as an inverse barometer. One can notice that the   between atmospheric pressure and mean sea level is due to alongshore wind stress forcing and is consistent with that expected from Ekman dynamics. The four EOF modes capture 87.16% for the x-component and 94.70% for the y-component of the total variance and are statistically significant.  Linear regression and ARIMA model forecasts were fitted to sea level and compared to the actual data. Even though both models gave similar results, the ARIMA model performed considerably better","PeriodicalId":32106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"37–46-37–46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/JAMS.VOL26ISS1PP37-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sea level analysis along the Northern Coast of the Oman Sea has been investigated on the basis of tide gauge measurements. Meteorological parameters, along with monsoon and NAO indices are used to study the response of sea level to local and global forcing.  The relation between sea level and forces are examined. The low correlation coefficient (-0.35) between sea level and atmospheric pressure at Chabahar indicates that the response to atmospheric pressure is not an inverse barometric. The nature of local inverse barometric effects are examined through a series of statistical models. Analysis between sea level and atmospheric pressure reveals a significant coherence, which means that the Oman Sea mean level responds to atmospheric pressure as an inverse barometer. One can notice that the   between atmospheric pressure and mean sea level is due to alongshore wind stress forcing and is consistent with that expected from Ekman dynamics. The four EOF modes capture 87.16% for the x-component and 94.70% for the y-component of the total variance and are statistically significant.  Linear regression and ARIMA model forecasts were fitted to sea level and compared to the actual data. Even though both models gave similar results, the ARIMA model performed considerably better
阿曼海的平均海平面变率及其对季风的响应和潮汐计测量的北大西洋涛动指数
在潮汐计测量的基础上,对阿曼海北部海岸的海平面进行了分析。利用气象参数、季风指数和NAO指数来研究海平面对局地和全球强迫的响应。考察了海平面与力之间的关系。Chabahar海平面与气压的低相关系数(-0.35)表明对气压的响应不是一个逆气压。通过一系列的统计模型考察了局地逆压效应的性质。海平面和大气压力之间的分析显示出显著的一致性,这意味着阿曼海的平均海平面作为一个逆晴雨表响应大气压力。人们可以注意到,大气压力和平均海平面之间的变化是由于沿岸风应力的作用,这与埃克曼动力学的预测是一致的。四种EOF模式分别占总方差的x分量的87.16%和y分量的94.70%,具有统计学显著性。采用线性回归和ARIMA模式对海平面进行拟合,并与实际数据进行比较。尽管两种模型给出了相似的结果,但ARIMA模型的表现要好得多
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书