Divergence Not Convergence : the Strengthening of the post-Communist Welfare State Model in Central and Eastern Europe After European Union Expansion

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
K. Piotrowska, G. Rae
{"title":"Divergence Not Convergence : the Strengthening of the post-Communist Welfare State Model in Central and Eastern Europe After European Union Expansion","authors":"K. Piotrowska, G. Rae","doi":"10.26412/PSR203.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the welfare states in the post-Communist countries from Central and Eastern Europe, which are members of the European Union. It applies the welfare regime typology methodology, partly developed by Esping-Andersen, as a framework for this research. The paper examines the two main predictions that emerged from the literature on the future of the welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe. Firstly, was the thesis that these welfare states would not fit easily into any of the existent models in Western Europe. Secondly, that these welfare states would gradually converge with one or more of the welfare regimes existent in the West. We have used hierarchical cluster analysis to check the extent of this welfare convergence/divergence over the first ten year period after the eastern expansion of the European Union (2004 and 2014). We discovered that in 2004 the postcommunist countries were divided between two clusters, although by 2014 all of the post-Communist countries (apart from Slovenia) had grouped together in one separate cluster. Therefore a process of divergence from the western European welfare models and a convergence between the post-Communist welfare states had actually occurred.","PeriodicalId":44204,"journal":{"name":"Polish Sociological Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26412/PSR203.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper analyses the welfare states in the post-Communist countries from Central and Eastern Europe, which are members of the European Union. It applies the welfare regime typology methodology, partly developed by Esping-Andersen, as a framework for this research. The paper examines the two main predictions that emerged from the literature on the future of the welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe. Firstly, was the thesis that these welfare states would not fit easily into any of the existent models in Western Europe. Secondly, that these welfare states would gradually converge with one or more of the welfare regimes existent in the West. We have used hierarchical cluster analysis to check the extent of this welfare convergence/divergence over the first ten year period after the eastern expansion of the European Union (2004 and 2014). We discovered that in 2004 the postcommunist countries were divided between two clusters, although by 2014 all of the post-Communist countries (apart from Slovenia) had grouped together in one separate cluster. Therefore a process of divergence from the western European welfare models and a convergence between the post-Communist welfare states had actually occurred.
分歧而非趋同:欧盟扩张后中欧和东欧后共产主义福利国家模式的强化
本文分析了中欧和东欧后共产主义国家的福利国家,这些国家是欧盟成员国。它应用了福利制度类型学方法,部分由埃斯平-安德森开发,作为本研究的框架。本文考察了文献中关于中欧和东欧福利国家未来的两个主要预测。首先,这些福利国家不容易适应西欧现有的任何模式。其次,这些福利国家将逐渐与西方存在的一种或多种福利制度趋同。我们使用层次聚类分析来检查欧盟东扩后的前十年(2004年和2014年)福利趋同/分化的程度。我们发现,2004年,后共产主义国家被分为两个集群,尽管到2014年,所有后共产主义国家(除了斯洛文尼亚)都被归为一个单独的集群。因此,与西欧福利模式的分化和后共产主义福利国家之间的趋同实际上已经发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信