How similar are the determinants of mortality and fertility?

Q4 Social Sciences
S. Ali, H. B. Siyal, M. Sultan
{"title":"How similar are the determinants of mortality and fertility?","authors":"S. Ali, H. B. Siyal, M. Sultan","doi":"10.30541/V32I4IIPP.1107-1115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multivariate analyses offer an explanation of the effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and biological factors on children ever born and child mortality in Pakistan in 1990-91. Data are obtained from the 1990-91 Pakistan Demographic and Fertility Survey. Household durables (10 items) are used as a proxy for economic status. Sex preference is measured as the percentage of females in the household. Multicollinearity was not a problem. The results showed that both women's age and contraceptive use had a positive, significant effect on fertility and mortality. For all cohorts, as age increased the magnitude of the coefficient decreased. Marriage age was found to be negatively, significantly associated with fertility and mortality. For women aged 35 years and older, contraceptive use became negatively associated with child mortality. This study showed women's work status after marriage was inversely related to fertility and negatively related to mortality. Urbanization only had a significant, negative association with fertility and was unrelated to mortality. More girls in the family was related to higher fertility but not mortality. Standard of living was significantly, negatively related to fertility and mortality. Education of women aged 35 years and older had a stronger effect on fertility than husband's education. Husband's education beyond the primary level had a significant, negative effect on child mortality. Breast feeding longer than 12 months was significantly, negatively related to fertility and mortality. Breast feeding under 6 months was related to higher fertility than those who breast fed for 6-12 months. Immunization had a insignificant, positive relationship to fertility and was significant only for women under 25 years of age. There was a negative, significant effect on mortality.","PeriodicalId":35921,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Development Review","volume":"32 4 Pt 2 1","pages":"1107-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30541/V32I4IIPP.1107-1115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Multivariate analyses offer an explanation of the effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and biological factors on children ever born and child mortality in Pakistan in 1990-91. Data are obtained from the 1990-91 Pakistan Demographic and Fertility Survey. Household durables (10 items) are used as a proxy for economic status. Sex preference is measured as the percentage of females in the household. Multicollinearity was not a problem. The results showed that both women's age and contraceptive use had a positive, significant effect on fertility and mortality. For all cohorts, as age increased the magnitude of the coefficient decreased. Marriage age was found to be negatively, significantly associated with fertility and mortality. For women aged 35 years and older, contraceptive use became negatively associated with child mortality. This study showed women's work status after marriage was inversely related to fertility and negatively related to mortality. Urbanization only had a significant, negative association with fertility and was unrelated to mortality. More girls in the family was related to higher fertility but not mortality. Standard of living was significantly, negatively related to fertility and mortality. Education of women aged 35 years and older had a stronger effect on fertility than husband's education. Husband's education beyond the primary level had a significant, negative effect on child mortality. Breast feeding longer than 12 months was significantly, negatively related to fertility and mortality. Breast feeding under 6 months was related to higher fertility than those who breast fed for 6-12 months. Immunization had a insignificant, positive relationship to fertility and was significant only for women under 25 years of age. There was a negative, significant effect on mortality.
死亡率和生育率的决定因素有多相似?
多元分析解释了1990-91年巴基斯坦人口、社会经济和生物学因素对出生儿童和儿童死亡率的影响。数据来自1990-91年巴基斯坦人口和生育率调查。家庭耐用品(10件)被用作经济状况的代表。性别偏好是用家庭中女性的百分比来衡量的。多重共线性不是问题。结果表明,妇女的年龄和避孕药具的使用对生育率和死亡率都有积极的、显著的影响。对于所有队列,随着年龄的增加,该系数的大小减小。研究发现,结婚年龄与生育率和死亡率呈显著负相关。对于35岁及以上的妇女,避孕药具的使用与儿童死亡率呈负相关。研究表明,女性婚后的工作状态与生育率呈负相关,与死亡率呈负相关。城市化仅与生育率呈显著负相关,与死亡率无关。家庭中女孩较多与较高的生育率有关,但与死亡率无关。生活水平与生育率和死亡率呈显著负相关。35岁及以上女性的受教育程度对生育率的影响大于丈夫的受教育程度。丈夫小学以上的教育程度对儿童死亡率有显著的负面影响。母乳喂养超过12个月与生育率和死亡率显著负相关。6个月以下母乳喂养比6-12个月母乳喂养的生育能力更高。免疫接种与生育率的正相关关系不显著,仅对25岁以下妇女有显著影响。对死亡率有显著的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Development Review
Pakistan Development Review Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to encourage original scholarly contributions that focus on a broad spectrum of development issues using empirical and theoretical approaches to scientific enquiry. With a view to generating scholarly debate on public policy issues, the journal particularly encourages scientific contributions that explore policy relevant issues pertaining to developing economies in general and Pakistan’s economy in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信