Russell Foster, M. Feldman
{"title":"From ‘Brexhaustion’ to ‘Covidiots’: the UK United Kingdom and the Populist Future","authors":"Russell Foster, M. Feldman","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One consequence of Brexit and the Covid-19 pandemic is the acceleration of Britain’s shift towards populism, and the rejection of expert-informed policymaking in favour of vox populi claims. The continuation of this toxicity beyond Brexit means that nationalist narratives have become Britain’s new ‘politics of everything’ (Valluvan 2019). The past five years have seen growing British contempt for technocracy, with ‘us and them’ populist narratives gaining widespread traction as the United Kingdom’s (UK) volatile political environment moves away from the political procedures and economic values by which the UK has operated since 1945. Since early 2020, this narrative has been significantly accelerated by Covid-19 countermeasures, with anti-EU parties and narratives on the left and right becoming anti-lockdown or anti-vaccine advocates. This commentary approaches the surge in British populism as emblematic of the UK’s shift from centrism towards polarised factions defined not by party, but by cross-spectrum contempt for technical governance. We argue that while populism is a worldwide phenomenon, it is not homogenous and the UK is particularly vulnerable to anti-status quo discourses and narratives. We argue that British populism should be seen not as a temporary phenomenon in response to specific events and conditions, but as a fluid, amorphous and heterogeneous ‘new normal’ which, in an environment of social mistrust, contempt for expertise and disillusionment with traditional politics, is now becoming the defining characteristic of British politics. © 2021, Journal of Contemporary European Research. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
从“脱欧”到“和解派”:英国和民粹主义的未来
英国脱欧和新冠肺炎大流行的一个后果是,英国加速向民粹主义转变,并拒绝专家知情的政策制定,转而支持民众呼声。在英国脱欧之后,这种毒性的持续意味着民族主义叙事已成为英国新的“一切政治”(Valluvan 2019)。在过去的五年里,英国人越来越鄙视技术官僚,随着英国动荡的政治环境远离英国自1945年以来一直遵循的政治程序和经济价值观,“我们和他们”的民粹主义叙事获得了广泛的关注。自2020年初以来,Covid-19对策大大加速了这一叙事,反欧盟政党和左翼和右翼的叙事成为了反封锁或反疫苗的倡导者。这篇评论认为,英国民粹主义的兴起象征着英国正从中间派转向两极分化的派系,这种派别不是由政党界定的,而是由对技术性治理的跨党派蔑视界定的。我们认为,虽然民粹主义是一种全球现象,但它并不同质,英国特别容易受到反现状话语和叙事的影响。我们认为,英国民粹主义不应被视为对特定事件和条件的一种暂时现象,而应被视为一种流动的、无定形的、异质的“新常态”,在社会不信任、对专业知识的蔑视和对传统政治的幻灭的环境中,它现在正在成为英国政治的决定性特征。©2021,当代欧洲研究杂志。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。