The effect of soil conditioners on the content of soluble carbohydrates, digestible protein and the carbohydrate–protein ratio in Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata

Q4 Environmental Science
M. Truba, K. Jankowski, B. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan, E. Malinowska
{"title":"The effect of soil conditioners on the content of soluble carbohydrates, digestible protein and the carbohydrate–protein ratio in Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata","authors":"M. Truba, K. Jankowski, B. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan, E. Malinowska","doi":"10.2478/oszn-2018-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A three-year field experiment (52.169°N, 22.280°E), in which each treatment was replicated three times, was set up in a randomised split-plot design in the autumn of 2011. The main experimental factors were soil conditioners with the trade names such as UGmax, Eko-Użyźniacz and Humus Active Papka, which were applied on their own and with mineral fertilisers. They were applied to the soil with two forage grasses: the Bora variety of Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne of the Info variety. The results were processed statistically with the multi-factor analysis of variance with a significance level of P≤0.05, whereas the differences between means were verified with Tukey’s test. The Statistica 12 program was used to do all the calculations. Compared to the control, soil conditioners (UGmax, Humus Active and Eko-Użyźniacz) did not reduce carbohydrate content in grass significantly. This proves that they can be applied to grass. Combination of mineral fertilisers with soil conditioners, relative to the control, resulted in about 15% increase in digestible protein content. Comparing all the plots, without the control, the ratio of non-structural carbohydrates to protein was the most favourable in the grass from plots where UGmax or nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertiliser or a combination of both was applied.","PeriodicalId":37767,"journal":{"name":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2018-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract A three-year field experiment (52.169°N, 22.280°E), in which each treatment was replicated three times, was set up in a randomised split-plot design in the autumn of 2011. The main experimental factors were soil conditioners with the trade names such as UGmax, Eko-Użyźniacz and Humus Active Papka, which were applied on their own and with mineral fertilisers. They were applied to the soil with two forage grasses: the Bora variety of Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne of the Info variety. The results were processed statistically with the multi-factor analysis of variance with a significance level of P≤0.05, whereas the differences between means were verified with Tukey’s test. The Statistica 12 program was used to do all the calculations. Compared to the control, soil conditioners (UGmax, Humus Active and Eko-Użyźniacz) did not reduce carbohydrate content in grass significantly. This proves that they can be applied to grass. Combination of mineral fertilisers with soil conditioners, relative to the control, resulted in about 15% increase in digestible protein content. Comparing all the plots, without the control, the ratio of non-structural carbohydrates to protein was the most favourable in the grass from plots where UGmax or nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertiliser or a combination of both was applied.
土壤调理剂对黑麦草和鸭茅可溶性碳水化合物、可消化蛋白质含量及糖蛋白比的影响
2011年秋季,采用随机分割区设计,在52.169°N, 22.280°E地区设置3年的田间试验,每个处理重复3次。主要的试验因素是商品名为UGmax、Eko-Użyźniacz和Humus Active Papka的土壤调整剂,这些土壤调整剂单独施用,并与矿物肥料一起施用。它们分别施用于两种牧草:蒲公英(Dactylis glomerata)的Bora品种和Info品种的多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)。结果采用多因素方差分析进行统计学处理,显著性水平P≤0.05,均数差异采用Tukey检验。使用Statistica 12程序进行所有的计算。与对照相比,土壤调理剂(UGmax、Humus Active和Eko-Użyźniacz)没有显著降低草中碳水化合物含量。这证明了它们可以应用于草。与对照相比,施用矿物肥和土壤调理剂使可消化蛋白质含量增加了约15%。在没有对照的情况下,在施用UGmax或氮磷钾(NPK)或两者组合的地块上,非结构性碳水化合物与蛋白质的比例最有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych
Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobow Naturalnych Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND NATURAL RESOURCES is a publication which addresses the issues of broadly understood environmental protection and publishes research and review papers. All these articles and papers are peer-reviewed. Interdisciplinary studies published by specialists in various fields present reciprocal relationships between the reactions taking place in the environment which are connected with natural element cycle and at the same time reflect both natural processes and human impacts. Themes of the works also concern socio-economic and technical issues at the UE, national, regional and local levels in the context of sustainable development. The main aim of the journal is to promote high level research in all aspects of environment and natural resources protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信