"en proie à la fièvre du cacao": Land and resource conflict on an ewe frontier, 1922-1939

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Benjamin N. Lawrance
{"title":"\"en proie à la fièvre du cacao\": Land and resource conflict on an ewe frontier, 1922-1939","authors":"Benjamin N. Lawrance","doi":"10.2307/3601950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1936 an Accra newspaper hit the streets with the alarmist headline \"Tribesmen Mobilise for War in British Togoland.\" According to the newspaper the people of Buem and Akposso, rivals for a parcel of land occupied by prosperous cocoa farms severed by the international boundary, were going to combat. Several attempts had been made to resolve the matter before British courts, but appeal after appeal swung the decision in different directions. The claims were further complicated because British courts had no jurisdiction over land under French control, which meant that a parallel case remained unresolved. Ultimately an appeal reached the Privy Council in London, but not before many other groups embroiled themselves in the conflict.British and French native policies of the nineteen-twenties and thirties significantly reorganized chiefly authority in their respective territories, prompting chiefs to attempt new strategies to aggrandize their economic and political power bases. The chiefs of Akposso and Buem, the fertile borderland between the two Togolands, were witness to a large emigration movement during this period caused by domestic and international economic change. The emigrants themselves followed well-worn paths to the Buem region marked by Ewe and others. In emigrating, they not only overcame European attempts to control their movement, but they pushed the Ewe \"frontier\" northward into a true borderland region. On a macro-level this article details how Ewe pushed the \"frontier of Eweness\" north with cocoa farming, emigration and settlement. On a micro-level this is a narrative of social conflict caused by local chiefly power networks, land ownership and tenure, and ethnic alliances. The story of the Buem-Akposso conflict, two non-Ewe communities, conceals a complicated narrative about Ewe emigration around a new border zone between the British and French mandates. It is thus a fascinating story for the colonial legal historian, offering new insight into the manipulation of Ewe identities for political and economic gain and the political instability ushered in by the \"cocoa rush\" in British Togoland.Although the plaintiffs in this conflict were the chiefs of Buem and Akposso, Ewe emigrants were the de facto protagonists of a much larger socio-economic transformation of the region. Although wildly exaggerated, the newspaper story captures the relative isolation of the densely forested region north of Hohoe, in British Togoland. Largely unsettled and unfarmed in the mid-nineteen-twenties, Buem by I936 was a site of intense demographic growth because of the expansion of cocoa farming. Thousands of settlers moved from French Togo, from both Ewe territory and elsewhere, and worked as day laborers, or bought land and hired their own farmhands. The French were unable to halt the exit, while the British openly encouraged the development and exploitation of the mountainous region, considering a logical development of the \"peasant capitalist\" mentality that had already transformed Akan territories. European authority ruptured as Ewe people voted with their feet and expanded cocoa farming, and with it Ewe language and customs. This article investigates the story of a border conflagration between two different \"frontier\" communities on the mandate borderland as a point of departure for a wider discussion of four themes familiar to African historians: the invention of tradition, status and authority; the development of colonial economies and borders; the development of the colonial mandate administration and its legal apparatus; and, the concept of ethnic identity, in this case \"Eweness\" and its evolving relationship with the ideas of ethnicity and nationalism. Chiefly status conflict, cocoa farming, and new land tenure arrangements, when studied as \"social process,\" can each be interpreted as markers of authority and identity. Emigration, the motivations underlying the movements, and the limitations of the mandate structure, particularly with respect to the control of borders, provide a critical link between colonial economies and the evolution of Ewe identities during the mandate period.","PeriodicalId":43935,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3601950","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3601950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

In 1936 an Accra newspaper hit the streets with the alarmist headline "Tribesmen Mobilise for War in British Togoland." According to the newspaper the people of Buem and Akposso, rivals for a parcel of land occupied by prosperous cocoa farms severed by the international boundary, were going to combat. Several attempts had been made to resolve the matter before British courts, but appeal after appeal swung the decision in different directions. The claims were further complicated because British courts had no jurisdiction over land under French control, which meant that a parallel case remained unresolved. Ultimately an appeal reached the Privy Council in London, but not before many other groups embroiled themselves in the conflict.British and French native policies of the nineteen-twenties and thirties significantly reorganized chiefly authority in their respective territories, prompting chiefs to attempt new strategies to aggrandize their economic and political power bases. The chiefs of Akposso and Buem, the fertile borderland between the two Togolands, were witness to a large emigration movement during this period caused by domestic and international economic change. The emigrants themselves followed well-worn paths to the Buem region marked by Ewe and others. In emigrating, they not only overcame European attempts to control their movement, but they pushed the Ewe "frontier" northward into a true borderland region. On a macro-level this article details how Ewe pushed the "frontier of Eweness" north with cocoa farming, emigration and settlement. On a micro-level this is a narrative of social conflict caused by local chiefly power networks, land ownership and tenure, and ethnic alliances. The story of the Buem-Akposso conflict, two non-Ewe communities, conceals a complicated narrative about Ewe emigration around a new border zone between the British and French mandates. It is thus a fascinating story for the colonial legal historian, offering new insight into the manipulation of Ewe identities for political and economic gain and the political instability ushered in by the "cocoa rush" in British Togoland.Although the plaintiffs in this conflict were the chiefs of Buem and Akposso, Ewe emigrants were the de facto protagonists of a much larger socio-economic transformation of the region. Although wildly exaggerated, the newspaper story captures the relative isolation of the densely forested region north of Hohoe, in British Togoland. Largely unsettled and unfarmed in the mid-nineteen-twenties, Buem by I936 was a site of intense demographic growth because of the expansion of cocoa farming. Thousands of settlers moved from French Togo, from both Ewe territory and elsewhere, and worked as day laborers, or bought land and hired their own farmhands. The French were unable to halt the exit, while the British openly encouraged the development and exploitation of the mountainous region, considering a logical development of the "peasant capitalist" mentality that had already transformed Akan territories. European authority ruptured as Ewe people voted with their feet and expanded cocoa farming, and with it Ewe language and customs. This article investigates the story of a border conflagration between two different "frontier" communities on the mandate borderland as a point of departure for a wider discussion of four themes familiar to African historians: the invention of tradition, status and authority; the development of colonial economies and borders; the development of the colonial mandate administration and its legal apparatus; and, the concept of ethnic identity, in this case "Eweness" and its evolving relationship with the ideas of ethnicity and nationalism. Chiefly status conflict, cocoa farming, and new land tenure arrangements, when studied as "social process," can each be interpreted as markers of authority and identity. Emigration, the motivations underlying the movements, and the limitations of the mandate structure, particularly with respect to the control of borders, provide a critical link between colonial economies and the evolution of Ewe identities during the mandate period.
《可可热的受害者》:1922-1939年边境上的土地和资源冲突
1936年,阿克拉的一份报纸刊登了一则危言耸听的标题:“部落成员在英属多哥兰发动战争”。据报纸报道,布埃姆和阿克波索的人民,争夺一片被国际边界分隔开的繁荣可可农场的土地,准备开战。为了在英国法庭上解决这个问题,已经做了几次尝试,但一次又一次的上诉使裁决朝着不同的方向发展。由于英国法院对法国控制下的土地没有管辖权,这意味着一个类似的案件仍未解决,因此索赔更加复杂。最终,伦敦枢密院收到了一份呼吁,但在此之前,许多其他团体也卷入了这场冲突。20世纪20年代和30年代,英国和法国的本土政策在各自的领土上进行了重大的权力重组,促使酋长们尝试新的战略来扩大他们的经济和政治权力基础。阿克波索和布埃姆是两个多哥兰之间肥沃的边界地带,两国酋长目睹了这一时期由于国内和国际经济变化而引起的大规模移民运动。移民们自己沿着破旧的小路来到了由埃维和其他人标记的布埃姆地区。在移民过程中,他们不仅克服了欧洲人控制他们的行动的企图,而且还将Ewe“边疆”向北推进,成为一个真正的边境地区。在宏观层面上,这篇文章详细描述了Ewe是如何通过可可种植、移民和定居向北推进“Ewe边疆”的。在微观层面上,这是对由地方主要权力网络、土地所有权和使用权以及种族联盟引起的社会冲突的叙述。布恩-阿克波索冲突的故事,两个非埃维族社区,隐藏了一个复杂的故事,关于埃维族移民在英法之间的新边界地区。因此,对于殖民法律历史学家来说,这是一个引人入胜的故事,为研究英属多哥兰的“可可热”带来的政治和经济利益以及政治不稳定,操纵母羊身份提供了新的视角。虽然这场冲突的原告是Buem和Akposso的酋长,但Ewe移民实际上是该地区更大的社会经济转型的主角。报纸上的这篇报道虽然夸张得离谱,但却抓住了英属多哥兰Hohoe北部茂密森林地区相对孤立的一面。在20世纪20年代中期,布埃姆基本上是无人居住的,到1936年,由于可可种植的扩张,布埃姆成为了人口急剧增长的地方。成千上万的移民从法属多哥,从伊威地区和其他地方搬来,做临时工,或者买地雇佣自己的农场工人。法国人无法阻止撤离,而英国人则公开鼓励对山区的开发和剥削,认为这是“农民资本主义”心态的合理发展,这种心态已经改变了阿坎地区。随着Ewe人用脚投票,可可豆种植的扩大,Ewe的语言和习俗也随之扩大,欧洲的权威随之破裂。本文调查了托管边界上两个不同的“边境”社区之间的边界大火的故事,作为对非洲历史学家熟悉的四个主题进行更广泛讨论的起点:传统,地位和权威的发明;殖民地经济和边界的发展;殖民地委任管理及其法律机构的发展;以及族群认同的概念,在这里是“母性”,以及它与族群和民族主义观念之间不断演变的关系。主要是地位冲突、可可种植和新的土地权属安排,当作为“社会过程”来研究时,每一个都可以被解释为权威和身份的标志。移徙、迁徙背后的动机和任务结构的限制,特别是在控制边界方面,在任务期间使殖民地经济和埃维族特性的演变之间产生了关键的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信