Due care under the Civil Obligations Act

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Zvonimir Slakoper, S. Nikšić
{"title":"Due care under the Civil Obligations Act","authors":"Zvonimir Slakoper, S. Nikšić","doi":"10.30925/zpfsr.44.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A provision requiring parties to obligations to act with due care is one of the basic provisions of the Obligations Act, and therefore applies to all obligations. This provision states types of due care, care of bonus pater familias, care of bonus businessman and care of bonus professional, but does not define either the way how to determine whether certain person acted with required care nor legal consequences of acting without it. The paper firstly analyzes and presents the application of this provision ratione materiae, ratione tempore and ratione personae. Then, in detail and concretely, from the literature and jurisprudence standpoint, it presents individual types of due care, i.e. requirements that an individual type of care puts before parties to obligations, as well as examples of when these requirements were not met. Furthermore, the way how to determine whether certain person acted with a required care is discussed and consequences of acting without due care. The connection between provisions is distinguished, which ties legal consequences with a request or a possibility of knowledge of certain facts and provisions that require acting with certain care. The request for certain knowledge or a possibility to have certain knowledge originate from the later provision, and consequently legal consequences for persons who had to know or could know certain facts.","PeriodicalId":41038,"journal":{"name":"ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.44.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A provision requiring parties to obligations to act with due care is one of the basic provisions of the Obligations Act, and therefore applies to all obligations. This provision states types of due care, care of bonus pater familias, care of bonus businessman and care of bonus professional, but does not define either the way how to determine whether certain person acted with required care nor legal consequences of acting without it. The paper firstly analyzes and presents the application of this provision ratione materiae, ratione tempore and ratione personae. Then, in detail and concretely, from the literature and jurisprudence standpoint, it presents individual types of due care, i.e. requirements that an individual type of care puts before parties to obligations, as well as examples of when these requirements were not met. Furthermore, the way how to determine whether certain person acted with a required care is discussed and consequences of acting without due care. The connection between provisions is distinguished, which ties legal consequences with a request or a possibility of knowledge of certain facts and provisions that require acting with certain care. The request for certain knowledge or a possibility to have certain knowledge originate from the later provision, and consequently legal consequences for persons who had to know or could know certain facts.
根据《民事义务法》给予应有的注意
要求义务当事人采取适当谨慎行动的条款是《义务法》的基本条款之一,因此适用于所有义务。该条款规定了应有的注意类型、对奖金家属的注意、对奖金商人的注意和对奖金专业人员的注意,但没有规定如何确定某人是否采取了必要的注意,也没有规定不采取必要注意的法律后果。本文首先从属事、属时和属人三个方面对该条款的适用进行了分析和论述。然后,从文献和法理学的角度详细而具体地介绍了个别类型的适当注意,即个别类型的注意对义务当事人提出的要求,以及未满足这些要求的例子。此外,还讨论了如何确定某人是否采取了必要的谨慎行动,以及不采取适当谨慎行动的后果。条款之间的联系是有区别的,它将法律后果与请求或了解某些事实的可能性以及需要谨慎行事的条款联系起来。对某些知识或获得某些知识的可能性的要求源于后面的规定,因此对必须知道或能够知道某些事实的人产生法律后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信