E. Bloom, Anastasia Karagiannakis, Jessica R. Toste, N. Heath, Effie Konstantinopoulos
{"title":"SEVERITY OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SOCIAL SKILLS DEFICITS","authors":"E. Bloom, Anastasia Karagiannakis, Jessica R. Toste, N. Heath, Effie Konstantinopoulos","doi":"10.2307/20466668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the differences in the rated social skills of elementary ‐ aged students at ‐ risk for emotional/behavioural disorders (E/BD) based on severity of academic difficulties. Teachers nominated students at ‐ risk for E/BD who were classified into four groups of academic difficulty based on the Wide Range Achievement Test ‐ 3. Students, parents, and teachers completed the Social Skills Rating System. Teachers’ ratings indicated that academic strengths did not significantly affect perceptions of students’ social competence; all children were rated with notable social skills deficits. Consistent with previous positive research, self ‐ ratings were uniformly positive across groups. Parents’ ratings indicated highest social competence for children with most severe academic deficits. Key words: emotional disorders, behavioural disorders, academic performance, elementary school, social competence;,self ‐ perceptions, parent perceptions, teacher perceptions Cette etude a explore les differences chez des eleves du primaire presentant des risques de troubles affectifs et du comportement dans l’evaluation de leurs habiletes sociales , par rapport a la gravite de leurs difficultes academiques. Les enseignants ont designe ces eleves a risque, qui ont ete repartis en quatre groupes en fonction de leurs difficultes academiques evaluees en utilisant le Wide Range Achievement Test ‐ 3 . Les eleves, les parents et les enseignants ont rempli le questionnaire sur les aptitudes sociales ( Social Skills Rating System ). Les evaluations des enseignants revelent que les aptitudes scolaires n’ont pas une incidence importante sur les perceptions des aptitudes sociales des eleves ; tous les enfants ont ete evalues comme ayant d’importants deficits quant aux aptitudes sociales. Conformement a des recherches anterieures, les auto ‐ evaluations sont uniformement positives dans tous les groupes. Les evaluations des parents font etat d’aptitudes sociales plus fortes chez les enfants ayant les deficits scolaires les plus graves. Mots cles : troubles affectifs et du comportement, rendement scolaire, ecole primaire, aptitude sociale, autoperceptions, perceptions des parents et des enseignants","PeriodicalId":40063,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20466668","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20466668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
This study explored the differences in the rated social skills of elementary ‐ aged students at ‐ risk for emotional/behavioural disorders (E/BD) based on severity of academic difficulties. Teachers nominated students at ‐ risk for E/BD who were classified into four groups of academic difficulty based on the Wide Range Achievement Test ‐ 3. Students, parents, and teachers completed the Social Skills Rating System. Teachers’ ratings indicated that academic strengths did not significantly affect perceptions of students’ social competence; all children were rated with notable social skills deficits. Consistent with previous positive research, self ‐ ratings were uniformly positive across groups. Parents’ ratings indicated highest social competence for children with most severe academic deficits. Key words: emotional disorders, behavioural disorders, academic performance, elementary school, social competence;,self ‐ perceptions, parent perceptions, teacher perceptions Cette etude a explore les differences chez des eleves du primaire presentant des risques de troubles affectifs et du comportement dans l’evaluation de leurs habiletes sociales , par rapport a la gravite de leurs difficultes academiques. Les enseignants ont designe ces eleves a risque, qui ont ete repartis en quatre groupes en fonction de leurs difficultes academiques evaluees en utilisant le Wide Range Achievement Test ‐ 3 . Les eleves, les parents et les enseignants ont rempli le questionnaire sur les aptitudes sociales ( Social Skills Rating System ). Les evaluations des enseignants revelent que les aptitudes scolaires n’ont pas une incidence importante sur les perceptions des aptitudes sociales des eleves ; tous les enfants ont ete evalues comme ayant d’importants deficits quant aux aptitudes sociales. Conformement a des recherches anterieures, les auto ‐ evaluations sont uniformement positives dans tous les groupes. Les evaluations des parents font etat d’aptitudes sociales plus fortes chez les enfants ayant les deficits scolaires les plus graves. Mots cles : troubles affectifs et du comportement, rendement scolaire, ecole primaire, aptitude sociale, autoperceptions, perceptions des parents et des enseignants
本研究探讨了具有情绪/行为障碍(E/BD)风险的小学年龄学生在学业困难严重程度上的社会技能评分差异。教师提名有患E/BD风险的学生,根据广谱成就测试(Wide Range Achievement Test‐3)将他们分为四组。学生、家长和老师完成了社会技能评分系统。教师的评分显示,学业优势对学生社会能力的感知没有显著影响;所有的孩子都被评为有明显的社交技能缺陷。与之前的积极研究一致,自我评价在各组中都是一致的积极的。父母的评分表明,学业缺陷最严重的孩子的社交能力最高。关键词:情绪障碍,行为障碍,学业成绩,小学,社会能力,自我感知,父母感知,教师感知,凯特研究与探索,与初级水平的差异,现状,风险,问题,影响,行为,社会适应能力评估,关系融洽,学习困难的严重程度。在设计水平测试中表现不佳,在四分之一组中表现不佳,在功能水平测试中表现不佳,在学术水平评估中表现不佳,在实用性测试中表现不佳。学生、家长和学生都不需要填写社交能力评估系统问卷。对学生相关能力的评价不高,对学生的能力评价不高,对学生的能力评价不高,对学生的能力评价不高;我们的孩子对社会价值的看法是错误的,这是社会能力的重要缺陷。合规性是指研究前瞻,减少自动评价,形成统一的积极因素,形成不同的群体。对父母的评价是社会能力加长处,对孩子的评价是缺陷加缺点,对孩子的评价是缺陷加坟墓。心理障碍:心理障碍影响心理行为、心理特征、学校倾向、社会倾向、自我认知、父母认知和学生认知
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Education (CJE) is a national peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the membership of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. The CJE prioritizes research and scholarly writing that is of relevance to the Canadian education community. The journal is read by scholars worldwide, and aims to represent the valuable contributions that Canadian scholars in education continue to make to the field. The Journal accepts and publishes both French and English articles and book reviews. CJE on occasion also publishes international papers that shed light on shared issues and that include Canadian authors as references.