Differentiating Vascular Dementia from Alzhemer’s Disease with Brief Cognitive Tests

I. Barbov, A. Georgievska, S. Arsova, S. Lazarova, I. Petrov
{"title":"Differentiating Vascular Dementia from Alzhemer’s Disease with Brief Cognitive Tests","authors":"I. Barbov, A. Georgievska, S. Arsova, S. Lazarova, I. Petrov","doi":"10.2478/mmr-2014-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are the most common causes of dementia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests investigate the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests in differentiating vascular dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Methods. Fifteen patients with mild VaD, 15 patients with probable AD and 30 healthy controls, matched for age, education and dementia severity, were submitted to the following cognitive tests: clock drawing (free drqawing and copy), category of letter fluency, delayed recall test of figures and the EXIT 25 battery. Results. VaD patients performed worse than AD patients in category fluency (p=0.014), letter fluency (p=0.043) and CLOX 2 (p=0.023), while AD cases performed worse than VaD patients in delayed recall (p=0.013). However, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for these tests displayed low sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosis between VaD and AD. Conclusions. Altough the performance of VaD and AD patients was significantly different in some cognitive tests, the value of such instruments in differentiating VaD from AD proved to be very limited.","PeriodicalId":86800,"journal":{"name":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","volume":"68 1","pages":"48 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmr-2014-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are the most common causes of dementia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests investigate the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests in differentiating vascular dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Methods. Fifteen patients with mild VaD, 15 patients with probable AD and 30 healthy controls, matched for age, education and dementia severity, were submitted to the following cognitive tests: clock drawing (free drqawing and copy), category of letter fluency, delayed recall test of figures and the EXIT 25 battery. Results. VaD patients performed worse than AD patients in category fluency (p=0.014), letter fluency (p=0.043) and CLOX 2 (p=0.023), while AD cases performed worse than VaD patients in delayed recall (p=0.013). However, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for these tests displayed low sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosis between VaD and AD. Conclusions. Altough the performance of VaD and AD patients was significantly different in some cognitive tests, the value of such instruments in differentiating VaD from AD proved to be very limited.
用简短的认知测试鉴别血管性痴呆与阿尔茨海默病
摘要介绍。阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)是老年人痴呆的最常见原因。本研究的目的是探讨简短认知测试的诊断价值,探讨简短认知测试在血管性痴呆与阿尔茨海默病鉴别中的诊断价值。方法。15例轻度VaD患者、15例可能AD患者和30例健康对照,年龄、教育程度和痴呆严重程度相匹配,进行以下认知测试:时钟绘制(自由绘制和复制)、字母流畅性类别、数字延迟回忆测试和EXIT 25电池。结果。VaD患者在类别流畅性(p=0.014)、字母流畅性(p=0.043)和clox2 (p=0.023)方面表现差于AD患者,而AD患者在延迟回忆方面表现差于VaD患者(p=0.013)。然而,这些试验的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对VaD和AD鉴别诊断的敏感性和特异性较低。结论。尽管VaD和AD患者在一些认知测试中的表现有显著差异,但这些工具在区分VaD和AD方面的价值非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信