Clinical Outcomes of Three Different Modes of Femoral Hamstring Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Hristijan Kostov, I. Kaftandziev, O. Arsovski, E. Kostova, Andreja Gavrilovski
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Three Different Modes of Femoral Hamstring Graft Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"Hristijan Kostov, I. Kaftandziev, O. Arsovski, E. Kostova, Andreja Gavrilovski","doi":"10.2478/mmr-2014-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. There are various methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of which the two main choices in autograft reconstruction involve the use of the bone-patella tendon-bone or hamstring graft. Femoral fixation can be divided into three main types: cortical suspensory devices such as Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Arthrex), interference screws, and femoral transfixation devices such as Transfix (Arthrex) and Rigidfix (Depuy-Mitek). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between Rigidfix, Transfix and Endobutton devices for soft tissue femoral fixation in primary ACL reconstruction using the autogenous hamstring graft. Methods. We conducted our study in 48 patients admitted to our clinic, University Traumatology Clinic, Clinical Center \"Mother Teresa\", Skopje for ACL reconstruction from September 2009 to May 2013. The patients with ACL reconstruction were assigned as Rigidfix group (n=28), the second patients to Transfix group (n=13) and the third to Endobutton group (n=7). MRI of the knee joint was done prior to surgery. A data sheet, containing demographic data, examination findings and Tegner & Lysholm score, was completed for each patient. Results. Tegner & Lysholm the average scores before surgery were 2.52 and 34.75 (p>0.05). Six month after arthroscopy, the average value of Tegner and Lysholm scores in patients with ACL reconstruction was 8.37 and 89.08. Comparison among them showed that the operative mode of Endobutton femoral fixation had the highest level of the Lysholm score. Conclusions. Endobutton (Tight rope-RT) yielded a better outcome compared to the other two modes of femoral fixation in terms of instant stability of the graft and the general results.","PeriodicalId":86800,"journal":{"name":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","volume":"68 1","pages":"44 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/mmr-2014-0010","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmr-2014-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. There are various methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of which the two main choices in autograft reconstruction involve the use of the bone-patella tendon-bone or hamstring graft. Femoral fixation can be divided into three main types: cortical suspensory devices such as Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Arthrex), interference screws, and femoral transfixation devices such as Transfix (Arthrex) and Rigidfix (Depuy-Mitek). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between Rigidfix, Transfix and Endobutton devices for soft tissue femoral fixation in primary ACL reconstruction using the autogenous hamstring graft. Methods. We conducted our study in 48 patients admitted to our clinic, University Traumatology Clinic, Clinical Center "Mother Teresa", Skopje for ACL reconstruction from September 2009 to May 2013. The patients with ACL reconstruction were assigned as Rigidfix group (n=28), the second patients to Transfix group (n=13) and the third to Endobutton group (n=7). MRI of the knee joint was done prior to surgery. A data sheet, containing demographic data, examination findings and Tegner & Lysholm score, was completed for each patient. Results. Tegner & Lysholm the average scores before surgery were 2.52 and 34.75 (p>0.05). Six month after arthroscopy, the average value of Tegner and Lysholm scores in patients with ACL reconstruction was 8.37 and 89.08. Comparison among them showed that the operative mode of Endobutton femoral fixation had the highest level of the Lysholm score. Conclusions. Endobutton (Tight rope-RT) yielded a better outcome compared to the other two modes of femoral fixation in terms of instant stability of the graft and the general results.
三种不同方式股骨腿筋移植物固定在前交叉韧带重建中的临床效果
摘要介绍。前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的方法多种多样,其中两种主要的选择包括骨-髌骨-肌腱-骨或腘绳肌移植。股骨固定可分为三种主要类型:皮质悬置装置,如Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Arthrex)、干涉螺钉和股内穿固定装置,如Transfix (Arthrex)和Rigidfix (Depuy-Mitek)。本研究的目的是比较Rigidfix、Transfix和Endobutton装置在自体腘绳肌腱移植物重建初次ACL中用于软组织股骨固定的临床结果。方法。我们对2009年9月至2013年5月在斯科普里“特蕾莎修女”临床中心大学创伤科诊所接受ACL重建的48例患者进行了研究。将ACL重建患者分为Rigidfix组(n=28)、Transfix组(n=13)和Endobutton组(n=7)。术前对膝关节进行MRI检查。每位患者填写一份数据表,包括人口统计数据、检查结果和Tegner & Lysholm评分。结果。Tegner & Lysholm患者术前平均评分分别为2.52分和34.75分(p < 0.05)。关节镜术后6个月,ACL重建患者的Tegner和Lysholm评分平均值分别为8.37和89.08。结果表明,Endobutton股骨内固定方式Lysholm评分最高。结论。与其他两种股骨固定方式相比,Endobutton (Tight rope-RT)在移植物的即时稳定性和总体结果方面取得了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信