Cross-checking of income tax returns with worth accretion

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
D. Popović
{"title":"Cross-checking of income tax returns with worth accretion","authors":"D. Popović","doi":"10.30925/zpfsr.43.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper Serbia’s Law on Determining the Origin of Property and the Special Tax is analysed and compared with solutions based on cross-checking of the declared income with the worth accretion, which can be found in comparative tax law. After having established the advantages and limits of the net worth method, the author presents this Serbian statute, pointing out the fact that significant resources have been allocated for its application. The explanation lies in its PR impact and the possibility that detected unreported income of those who are the Government’s political opponents could be taxed at a rate of 75%. Net worth method has been present in another Serbian statute since 2003, but it was not applied due to the absence of political will. However, this provision remains in the system, providing for dualism since 2021 – one group of taxpayers is subject to the old regime (with 20% tax), while the others are exposed to new confiscatory 75% tax. The analysis shows that numerous provisions of the 2021 statute contradict constitutional provisions on the unity of legal order, nondiscrimination, legality of taxes, and prohibition of retroactivity. Provided these flaws are eliminated, the application of net worth method could make sense.","PeriodicalId":41038,"journal":{"name":"ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.43.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the paper Serbia’s Law on Determining the Origin of Property and the Special Tax is analysed and compared with solutions based on cross-checking of the declared income with the worth accretion, which can be found in comparative tax law. After having established the advantages and limits of the net worth method, the author presents this Serbian statute, pointing out the fact that significant resources have been allocated for its application. The explanation lies in its PR impact and the possibility that detected unreported income of those who are the Government’s political opponents could be taxed at a rate of 75%. Net worth method has been present in another Serbian statute since 2003, but it was not applied due to the absence of political will. However, this provision remains in the system, providing for dualism since 2021 – one group of taxpayers is subject to the old regime (with 20% tax), while the others are exposed to new confiscatory 75% tax. The analysis shows that numerous provisions of the 2021 statute contradict constitutional provisions on the unity of legal order, nondiscrimination, legality of taxes, and prohibition of retroactivity. Provided these flaws are eliminated, the application of net worth method could make sense.
交叉核对所得税申报表与价值增加
本文对塞尔维亚的财产和特别税起源确定法进行了分析,并与比较税法中基于申报收入与价值增加交叉核对的解决方案进行了比较。在确定了净值法的优点和局限性之后,作者提出了这项塞尔维亚法规,并指出为其应用划拨了大量资源。解释在于它的公共关系影响,以及那些被发现的未报告收入的可能性,这些收入是政府的政治对手,可能被征收75%的税。自2003年以来,净值法已经出现在另一个塞尔维亚法规中,但由于缺乏政治意愿,它没有被应用。然而,这一规定仍然存在,自2021年以来提供了二元论-一组纳税人受旧制度(20%的税)的约束,而其他人则面临新的75%的没收税。分析认为,《2021年法》的许多条款与宪法中关于法律秩序统一性、非歧视、税收合法性、禁止溯及力的规定相抵触。只要消除了这些缺陷,净值法的应用就有了意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信