Swimming against the Tide: Boys, Literacies, and Schooling--An Australian Story.

Q3 Social Sciences
Nola Alloway
{"title":"Swimming against the Tide: Boys, Literacies, and Schooling--An Australian Story.","authors":"Nola Alloway","doi":"10.2307/20466651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on issues related to boys, literacies, and schooling as played out in the Australian context. It reflects on the swathe of populist discourse centring on boys, and on literacy, that drives a potentially divisive education agenda. In providing more nuanced analyses of the debates surrounding the disputed territory of boys, literacies, and schooling, the article offers examples of disaggregated literacy test data to demonstrate the importance of adopting a “which boys” and “which girls” approach to the issues. The article also provides brief coverage of the Success for Boys program, introduced in Australia in 2006, that encourages teachers to swim against the tide of populism by embracing the agenda in all of its complexity. Key words : gender, literacy achievement, schooling Cet article porte sur des questions reliees aux garcons, aux litteraties et a l’ecole dans un contexte australien. L’auteure etudie les multiples discours populistes sur les garcons et la litteratie susceptibles d’entrainer une approche fractionnelle en education. Tout en fournissant une analyse nuancee des debats entourant le territoire conteste des garcons, les litteraties et l’ecole, l’article fournit des exemples de donnees de tests de litteratie non regroupees qui demontrent l’importance de distinguer de « quels garcons » et de « quelles filles » il s’agit. En outre, l’article presente brievement un programme lance en 2006, Success for Boys, qui incite les enseignants a nager a contre ‐ courant du populisme en adoptant un point de vue qui tient compte de toute la complexite de l’education. Mots cles : genre, rendement en litteratie, education","PeriodicalId":40063,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20466651","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20466651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

This article focuses on issues related to boys, literacies, and schooling as played out in the Australian context. It reflects on the swathe of populist discourse centring on boys, and on literacy, that drives a potentially divisive education agenda. In providing more nuanced analyses of the debates surrounding the disputed territory of boys, literacies, and schooling, the article offers examples of disaggregated literacy test data to demonstrate the importance of adopting a “which boys” and “which girls” approach to the issues. The article also provides brief coverage of the Success for Boys program, introduced in Australia in 2006, that encourages teachers to swim against the tide of populism by embracing the agenda in all of its complexity. Key words : gender, literacy achievement, schooling Cet article porte sur des questions reliees aux garcons, aux litteraties et a l’ecole dans un contexte australien. L’auteure etudie les multiples discours populistes sur les garcons et la litteratie susceptibles d’entrainer une approche fractionnelle en education. Tout en fournissant une analyse nuancee des debats entourant le territoire conteste des garcons, les litteraties et l’ecole, l’article fournit des exemples de donnees de tests de litteratie non regroupees qui demontrent l’importance de distinguer de « quels garcons » et de « quelles filles » il s’agit. En outre, l’article presente brievement un programme lance en 2006, Success for Boys, qui incite les enseignants a nager a contre ‐ courant du populisme en adoptant un point de vue qui tient compte de toute la complexite de l’education. Mots cles : genre, rendement en litteratie, education
逆流而上:男孩、文化和学校教育——一个澳大利亚的故事。
这篇文章的重点是在澳大利亚的背景下与男孩、文化和学校教育有关的问题。它反映了以男孩和扫盲为中心的一系列民粹主义话语,这些话语推动了一个可能造成分裂的教育议程。在对围绕男孩、读写能力和学校教育的争议领域的辩论进行更细致的分析时,文章提供了分类的读写能力测试数据的例子,以证明采用“哪些男孩”和“哪些女孩”的方法来解决这些问题的重要性。这篇文章还简要介绍了2006年在澳大利亚推出的“男孩成功”计划,该计划鼓励教师通过接受所有复杂的议程来对抗民粹主义的潮流。关键词:性别,读写成绩,学校教育,Cet文章,提问,解题,解题,解题,解题,解题,解题文艺学研究多元话语、民粹主义、古典主义、文学易受影响,而文艺学研究则是一种分数式教育。兜售en fournissant一个分析nuancee des讨论entourant le territoire conteste des男生,les litteraties并,l 'article fournit例子数据de测试de litteratie不regroupees demontrent重要德高尚的德«紧密相连男生»和«哪些女生»需要年代。此外,我在2006年的一篇文章中介绍了一项名为“男孩的成功”的项目,该项目在很大程度上鼓励了一些学生,比如管理者,以及一些受欢迎的人,以及一些接受教育的人,这些人的价值在很大程度上决定了教育的复杂性。格言:体裁、文学渲染、教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Education
Canadian Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Education (CJE) is a national peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the membership of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. The CJE prioritizes research and scholarly writing that is of relevance to the Canadian education community. The journal is read by scholars worldwide, and aims to represent the valuable contributions that Canadian scholars in education continue to make to the field. The Journal accepts and publishes both French and English articles and book reviews. CJE on occasion also publishes international papers that shed light on shared issues and that include Canadian authors as references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信