LEARNING TO TEACH: TEACHER CANDIDATES REFLECT ON THE RELATIONAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES OF RESPONSIVE MENTORSHIP

Q3 Social Sciences
Finney Cherian
{"title":"LEARNING TO TEACH: TEACHER CANDIDATES REFLECT ON THE RELATIONAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES OF RESPONSIVE MENTORSHIP","authors":"Finney Cherian","doi":"10.2307/20466624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using interviews, focus groups, and observations, I examined teacher candidates’ experiences with their mentoring teachers over two student teaching periods. Using Feiman‐Nemser and Rosaen’s (1997) mentorship model of guiding teacher learning, I investigated the relational, conceptual, and contextual aspects of the student teaching experience. Results suggest that opportunities to question teaching practices as well as co‐ planning and co‐teaching with associates supported the development of self‐reflection and educational philosophies. Data suggest that mentor beliefs and pressures to maintain board and provincial standardized curriculum reforms prevented teacher candidates from exploring social justice, constructivist, and inquiry‐oriented pedagogies.","PeriodicalId":40063,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Education","volume":"30 1","pages":"25-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20466624","citationCount":"86","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20466624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

Abstract

Using interviews, focus groups, and observations, I examined teacher candidates’ experiences with their mentoring teachers over two student teaching periods. Using Feiman‐Nemser and Rosaen’s (1997) mentorship model of guiding teacher learning, I investigated the relational, conceptual, and contextual aspects of the student teaching experience. Results suggest that opportunities to question teaching practices as well as co‐ planning and co‐teaching with associates supported the development of self‐reflection and educational philosophies. Data suggest that mentor beliefs and pressures to maintain board and provincial standardized curriculum reforms prevented teacher candidates from exploring social justice, constructivist, and inquiry‐oriented pedagogies.
学习教学:教师候选人反思响应式指导的关系、概念和情境影响
通过访谈、焦点小组和观察,我考察了教师候选人在两个学生教学期间与他们的指导老师的经历。利用Feiman - Nemser和Rosaen(1997)的指导教师学习的师徒关系模型,我研究了学生教学经验的关系、概念和语境方面。结果表明,质疑教学实践以及与同事共同规划和共同教学的机会支持了自我反思和教育理念的发展。数据表明,导师的信念和维持董事会和省级标准化课程改革的压力阻碍了教师候选人探索社会正义、建构主义和探究导向教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Education
Canadian Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Education (CJE) is a national peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the membership of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. The CJE prioritizes research and scholarly writing that is of relevance to the Canadian education community. The journal is read by scholars worldwide, and aims to represent the valuable contributions that Canadian scholars in education continue to make to the field. The Journal accepts and publishes both French and English articles and book reviews. CJE on occasion also publishes international papers that shed light on shared issues and that include Canadian authors as references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信