Prefixless Past Participles in West Central German: Phonology or Perfective Aspect?

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
David J. Bolter
{"title":"Prefixless Past Participles in West Central German: Phonology or Perfective Aspect?","authors":"David J. Bolter","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper presents an analysis of the use of ge -Prefix in dialects of German for the formation of the past participle. In order to address the issue of prefixation in West Central German, I have compared two sources of dialect data. First, I have consulted Wenker surveys from the late 19th century and secondly, I have consulted the “Mittelrheinischer Sprachatlas”, which collected a variety of dialect data from around 1980. The pattern of prefixation that emerges from these data shows that West Central German prefixation has preserved the historical German system of not using a prefix in the past participial forms of inherently “perfective” verbs such as finden, kommen, treffen, werden and bringen , though the numbers differ for individual verbs into the 19th century. In the 20th century in these varieties, the pattern appears to be moving away from the “perfective” system towards a new system of prefixation, whereby all past participles get a prefix, except velar-initial verbal roots. Thus, forms such as the participle of geben are majority prefixless, but the participle of bringen is majority prefixed. Furthermore, these prefixation patterns can be seen to define differences between Ripuarian, which mostly retains the old prefixless past participles without much addition, Moselle Franconian, which adds more velar-initial roots to the prefixless group and Rhine Franconian, which generally removes the category of prefixless past participles from the language.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following paper presents an analysis of the use of ge -Prefix in dialects of German for the formation of the past participle. In order to address the issue of prefixation in West Central German, I have compared two sources of dialect data. First, I have consulted Wenker surveys from the late 19th century and secondly, I have consulted the “Mittelrheinischer Sprachatlas”, which collected a variety of dialect data from around 1980. The pattern of prefixation that emerges from these data shows that West Central German prefixation has preserved the historical German system of not using a prefix in the past participial forms of inherently “perfective” verbs such as finden, kommen, treffen, werden and bringen , though the numbers differ for individual verbs into the 19th century. In the 20th century in these varieties, the pattern appears to be moving away from the “perfective” system towards a new system of prefixation, whereby all past participles get a prefix, except velar-initial verbal roots. Thus, forms such as the participle of geben are majority prefixless, but the participle of bringen is majority prefixed. Furthermore, these prefixation patterns can be seen to define differences between Ripuarian, which mostly retains the old prefixless past participles without much addition, Moselle Franconian, which adds more velar-initial roots to the prefixless group and Rhine Franconian, which generally removes the category of prefixless past participles from the language.
中西部德语无前缀过去分词:音系学还是完成体?
本文分析了德语方言中用ge前缀构成过去分词的情况。为了解决中西部德语的前缀问题,我比较了两种方言数据来源。首先,我查阅了19世纪末的Wenker调查,其次,我查阅了“Mittelrheinischer Sprachatlas”,它收集了1980年左右的各种方言数据。从这些数据中出现的前缀模式表明,中西部德语的前缀保留了德语的历史系统,即在固有的“完成”动词(如finden, kommen, treffen, werden和bringen)的过去分词形式中不使用前缀,尽管单个动词的数量在19世纪有所不同。在20世纪的这些变体中,这种模式似乎正在从“完成”系统转向一种新的前缀系统,即所有的过去分词都有一个前缀,除了动词词根。因此,geben的分词是多数前缀形式,而bringen的分词是多数前缀形式。此外,这些前缀模式可以看出Ripuarian语和Rhine Franconian语之间的差异,前者主要保留了旧的无前缀过去分词,没有太多添加,Moselle Franconian语在无前缀组中添加了更多的velar-initial词根,而后者基本上从语言中删除了无前缀过去分词的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Aufsätze, Diskussionsbeiträge, Berichte, Rezensionen und Besprechungsexemplare werden nur an die Adresse der Redaktion erbeten. Für unaufgefordert eingesandte Rezensionsexemplare kann die Gewähr einer Besprechung nicht übernommen werden. Das neue Merkblatt für die Einrichtung von Manuskripten kann bei der Redaktion angefordert oder unter Richtlinien für die Erstellung von Beiträgen heruntergeladen werden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信