Legal Review of Kashmir Conflict: An Approach To Resolution Through Rawls’s Theory of Justice

Muhammad Haris, F. Masood
{"title":"Legal Review of Kashmir Conflict: An Approach To Resolution Through Rawls’s Theory of Justice","authors":"Muhammad Haris, F. Masood","doi":"10.30913/ALINTERISOSBIL.826718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Independence, Kashmir has been the greatest source of conflict between India and Pakistan. Since the partition, it was apprehended that the conflict of Kashmir may linger on for several years before a decisive solution is reached. This problem has lead Pakistan and India into three major wars and several small-scale conflicts (it may lead to further conflicts in the future if not resolved). This article seeks to propose that Kashmir was definitely a bone of contention between the two newly independent states that could not be overseen; however, there were other various factors of domestic and international nature that triggered the conflict. This article, while discussing the background, it analyses the legal claims of both parties and political issues regarding the conflict. In the last section, a brief discussion on the possible future solutions will be put forward. The basic aim of the article is to review the matter of Kashmir conflict objectively and in sheer isolation from any sort of bias. The arguments and reviews put forward will be impartial in order to illuminate the matter on the one hand and eradicate misconceptions on the other.","PeriodicalId":52722,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri sosyal bilimler dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri sosyal bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30913/ALINTERISOSBIL.826718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Independence, Kashmir has been the greatest source of conflict between India and Pakistan. Since the partition, it was apprehended that the conflict of Kashmir may linger on for several years before a decisive solution is reached. This problem has lead Pakistan and India into three major wars and several small-scale conflicts (it may lead to further conflicts in the future if not resolved). This article seeks to propose that Kashmir was definitely a bone of contention between the two newly independent states that could not be overseen; however, there were other various factors of domestic and international nature that triggered the conflict. This article, while discussing the background, it analyses the legal claims of both parties and political issues regarding the conflict. In the last section, a brief discussion on the possible future solutions will be put forward. The basic aim of the article is to review the matter of Kashmir conflict objectively and in sheer isolation from any sort of bias. The arguments and reviews put forward will be impartial in order to illuminate the matter on the one hand and eradicate misconceptions on the other.
克什米尔冲突的法律审视:罗尔斯正义理论的解决途径
独立后,克什米尔一直是印度和巴基斯坦之间冲突的最大根源。自分治以来,人们担心克什米尔的冲突可能会持续数年,直到达成一项决定性的解决办法。这个问题导致巴基斯坦和印度发生了三次主要战争和几次小规模冲突(如果不解决,可能会导致未来进一步的冲突)。这篇文章试图提出,克什米尔绝对是两个新独立国家之间争论的焦点,无法监督;然而,还有其他各种国内和国际性质的因素引发了冲突。本文在讨论背景的同时,分析了冲突双方的法律主张和政治问题。在最后一节,将简要讨论未来可能的解决方案。这篇文章的基本目的是客观地、完全不带任何偏见地审查克什米尔冲突问题。提出的论点和评论将是公正的,一方面是为了阐明问题,另一方面是为了消除误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信