{"title":"Wachstumstheorie und Geschichtsphilosophie","authors":"C. Kremser","doi":"10.25162/vswg-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Theory of Institutional Change in its version by Douglass C. North tries to explain why in some countries institutional change and economic growth occurs, while in other countries institutional standstill and economic stagnation is persistent by integrating institutions into neoclassical growth theory. Institutions are capable of lowering transaction costs. This approach raises the claim to be a conceptual framework for interpreting entire recorded human history and thus pursues a universal-historical intention. According to this framework, throughout all of human history there have been just three institutional orders: the primitive order, the limited access order, and finally the open access order. In doing so the Theory of Institutional Change presumes that history conforms to certain characteristics such as meaningfulness, rationality, unity, momentum, necessity and directionality. This, however, makes the Theory of Institutional Change not only to an economic growth theory, but also to a philosophy of history.","PeriodicalId":83466,"journal":{"name":"Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/vswg-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Theory of Institutional Change in its version by Douglass C. North tries to explain why in some countries institutional change and economic growth occurs, while in other countries institutional standstill and economic stagnation is persistent by integrating institutions into neoclassical growth theory. Institutions are capable of lowering transaction costs. This approach raises the claim to be a conceptual framework for interpreting entire recorded human history and thus pursues a universal-historical intention. According to this framework, throughout all of human history there have been just three institutional orders: the primitive order, the limited access order, and finally the open access order. In doing so the Theory of Institutional Change presumes that history conforms to certain characteristics such as meaningfulness, rationality, unity, momentum, necessity and directionality. This, however, makes the Theory of Institutional Change not only to an economic growth theory, but also to a philosophy of history.
道格拉斯·诺斯(douglas C. North)的《制度变迁理论》(Theory of Institutional Change)试图通过将制度整合到新古典增长理论中来解释为什么在一些国家发生了制度变迁和经济增长,而在另一些国家却持续存在制度停滞和经济停滞。机构有能力降低交易成本。这种方法提出了一种解释整个人类历史记录的概念框架,从而追求普遍历史的意图。根据这个框架,在整个人类历史上,只有三种制度秩序:原始秩序,有限获取秩序,最后是开放获取秩序。在此过程中,制度变迁理论假定历史符合某些特征,如有意义、理性、统一性、动量、必然性和方向性。然而,这使得制度变迁理论不仅成为一种经济增长理论,而且成为一种历史哲学。