Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des biologischen Terminus ‚Gen‘

K. Plischke, A. Labisch
{"title":"Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des biologischen Terminus ‚Gen‘","authors":"K. Plischke, A. Labisch","doi":"10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary philosophy of science places the origins of the predominant attributes of the term ‘gene’ in the year 1900 when Gregor Mendel’s work was rediscovered. After that, his phrase of discrete units of heredity, which he had developed on purely statistical and formal grounds, was replaced by that of morphologically definable and experimentally verifiable factors on chromosomes. Yet it was the speculative biology of the second half of the 19th century that opened up the epistemic sphere for a new conception of heredity: heredity as the transmission of particulate, hereditable material units with a tendency for self-preservation. This approach helped the then young discipline of biology get geared towards pure science with the aim of dissociating its terminology, which was deduced a priori, from the preconceptions of natural philosophy. In the early 20th century, the era of classical genetics, experimental systems were developed which, by means of experiments on model organisms, defined the hereditary particles, which had been speculatively assumed and the terminology for which had been developed in strict argumentations in the 19th century, more precisely and, in the 1940s, associated them with nucleic acid: physically detectable, material units without any final causality. They were said to be stable and, at the same time, mutable as well as capable of self-reproductivity, self-selectivity and memory. The term ‚code mechanism‘ paraphrases this dimension formerly unknown to physics. DNA epitomizes the perfect biological principle. The gene is declared the reason for the spontaneity and the specificity of organic matter. Still this concept includes components that have been framed by the biology of the 19th century. The most recent conception of the gene is not free from teleological anthropomorphisms. The sheer physical automatism gives the picture of molecular initial conditions that would contain the causes for the outcome of the development of the organism with all its variability, conceptualized by the term memory.","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary philosophy of science places the origins of the predominant attributes of the term ‘gene’ in the year 1900 when Gregor Mendel’s work was rediscovered. After that, his phrase of discrete units of heredity, which he had developed on purely statistical and formal grounds, was replaced by that of morphologically definable and experimentally verifiable factors on chromosomes. Yet it was the speculative biology of the second half of the 19th century that opened up the epistemic sphere for a new conception of heredity: heredity as the transmission of particulate, hereditable material units with a tendency for self-preservation. This approach helped the then young discipline of biology get geared towards pure science with the aim of dissociating its terminology, which was deduced a priori, from the preconceptions of natural philosophy. In the early 20th century, the era of classical genetics, experimental systems were developed which, by means of experiments on model organisms, defined the hereditary particles, which had been speculatively assumed and the terminology for which had been developed in strict argumentations in the 19th century, more precisely and, in the 1940s, associated them with nucleic acid: physically detectable, material units without any final causality. They were said to be stable and, at the same time, mutable as well as capable of self-reproductivity, self-selectivity and memory. The term ‚code mechanism‘ paraphrases this dimension formerly unknown to physics. DNA epitomizes the perfect biological principle. The gene is declared the reason for the spontaneity and the specificity of organic matter. Still this concept includes components that have been framed by the biology of the 19th century. The most recent conception of the gene is not free from teleological anthropomorphisms. The sheer physical automatism gives the picture of molecular initial conditions that would contain the causes for the outcome of the development of the organism with all its variability, conceptualized by the term memory.
终点为谢谢我的生物‚基因”
当代科学哲学认为,“基因”一词的主要属性起源于1900年,当时孟德尔(Gregor Mendel)的工作被重新发现。在那之后,他在纯粹统计学和形式化的基础上提出的离散遗传单位的说法,被染色体上形态上可定义和实验上可验证的因素所取代。然而,正是19世纪下半叶的思辨生物学为一种新的遗传概念开辟了认知领域:遗传是具有自我保存倾向的微粒、可遗传的物质单位的传播。这种方法帮助当时还很年轻的生物学学科朝着纯科学的方向发展,目的是将其术语从自然哲学的先入为主的观念中分离出来,而这些术语是先验地推断出来的。在20世纪早期,经典遗传学的时代,实验系统被开发出来,通过对模式生物的实验,更精确地定义了遗传粒子,这些粒子是推测性的假设,其术语是在19世纪的严格论证中发展起来的,并在20世纪40年代将它们与核酸联系起来:物理上可检测的,没有任何最终因果关系的物质单位。它们被认为是稳定的,同时也是可变的,并且能够自我繁殖、自我选择和记忆。术语“编码机制”解释了这个以前不为物理学所知的维度。DNA是完美生物学原理的缩影。基因被认为是有机物的自发性和特异性的原因。这个概念仍然包含了被19世纪的生物学所框定的成分。最近的基因概念并没有摆脱目的论的拟人论。纯粹的物理自动性给出了分子初始条件的图景,这些初始条件将包含生物体发展的结果的原因,以及所有的可变性,被术语记忆概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信