„Wir wollen mit den ersten Heften nicht gleich Sigerist und die Amerikaner verärgern!“

F. Bruns, A. Oommen-Halbach
{"title":"„Wir wollen mit den ersten Heften nicht gleich Sigerist und die Amerikaner verärgern!“","authors":"F. Bruns, A. Oommen-Halbach","doi":"10.25162/sudhoff-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on scattered archival records this article explores the circumstances allowing the new release of the German medico-historical journal “Sudhoffs Archiv” in 1952. The article focuses on the paralyzing conditions of the publishing trade in post-1945 Germany due to a tremendous lack of resources, a growing political East-West-antagonism and the Nazi background of both authors and publishers. The article examines how academics competed for influence in the newly-structured field of German Medical History which, in the 1950s, underwent a generational change. However, former students' loyalties to their teachers remained very close resulting in a search for continuity. This became visible when, in 1952, the first postwar volume of “Sudhoffs Archiv“ appeared, joining together a first part comprising of articles authored and submitted to the editors in 1943 and a second part consisting of articles submitted for the 1952 re-launch, epitomizing the missed chance for a new beginning. The examined correspondences of the new editors shed light on the protagonists' political opportunism vis-a-vis readers outside Germany and their struggle both for quality assurance in a discipline, which was deprived of its most progressive exponents as a consequence of emigration during the Nazi period, and for recognition in the international scientific community. In this complex field of conflicting interests, the journal missed a substantial and methodological reorientation in the 1950s.","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on scattered archival records this article explores the circumstances allowing the new release of the German medico-historical journal “Sudhoffs Archiv” in 1952. The article focuses on the paralyzing conditions of the publishing trade in post-1945 Germany due to a tremendous lack of resources, a growing political East-West-antagonism and the Nazi background of both authors and publishers. The article examines how academics competed for influence in the newly-structured field of German Medical History which, in the 1950s, underwent a generational change. However, former students' loyalties to their teachers remained very close resulting in a search for continuity. This became visible when, in 1952, the first postwar volume of “Sudhoffs Archiv“ appeared, joining together a first part comprising of articles authored and submitted to the editors in 1943 and a second part consisting of articles submitted for the 1952 re-launch, epitomizing the missed chance for a new beginning. The examined correspondences of the new editors shed light on the protagonists' political opportunism vis-a-vis readers outside Germany and their struggle both for quality assurance in a discipline, which was deprived of its most progressive exponents as a consequence of emigration during the Nazi period, and for recognition in the international scientific community. In this complex field of conflicting interests, the journal missed a substantial and methodological reorientation in the 1950s.
"不要把所有的后期圣徒的故事都当成苦行僧,让我们激怒那些美国人!"
利用零散的档案记录,本文探讨了1952年德国医学历史杂志“Sudhoffs档案”新发行的情况。本文着重分析了1945年后德国出版业的瘫痪状况,原因是资源极度匮乏、东西方政治对立加剧以及作者和出版商都有纳粹背景。这篇文章考察了学者们是如何在20世纪50年代经历了代际变化的新结构的德国医学史领域竞争影响力的。然而,以前的学生对老师的忠诚仍然非常密切,这导致了对连续性的追求。1952年,战后出版的第一卷《苏德霍夫斯档案》(Sudhoffs archive)问世,第一部分包括1943年撰写并提交给编辑的文章,第二部分包括提交给1952年再版的文章,这体现了错过了一个新开端的机会。新编辑的信件经过审查后,揭示了主角们面对德国以外读者的政治机会主义,以及他们为学科质量保证(由于纳粹时期的移民,这一学科失去了最进步的倡导者)和国际科学界的认可而进行的斗争。在这个利益冲突的复杂领域,该杂志在20世纪50年代错过了实质性和方法上的重新定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信