Problems with databases and the XML solution

Q4 Arts and Humanities
J. G. Keating, Denis Clancy, Thomas O'Connor, M. Lyons
{"title":"Problems with databases and the XML solution","authors":"J. G. Keating, Denis Clancy, Thomas O'Connor, M. Lyons","doi":"10.2307/25529641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Databases of biographical material are now a common feature of historical research. Many historians have converted archive-derived data into electronic format to facilitate the storage, querying and presentation of the material. In some cases, these electronic databases have been made available online. However, as biographical databases have proliferated on the web, problems have emerged, many of them linked to the type of technology used by historians. Most history databases are implemented using unsophisticated tools like Microsoft Access. While these systems are adequate as data-storage facilities they impose certain limitations. In particular, they oblige historians to shoehorn historical data into pre-existing categories that are not custom built for the material in question. Nor do they easily accommodate variation in the density of information between individual records. This results in the generation of unfilled ‘white space’ so that database size and inflexibility increase even though many of the records remain sparsely populated. While commercially produced databases have query facilities these become more difficult to operate as the individual database becomes more complex. Merging is also problematic.","PeriodicalId":38354,"journal":{"name":"Archivium Hibernicum","volume":"57 1","pages":"268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25529641","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivium Hibernicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/25529641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Databases of biographical material are now a common feature of historical research. Many historians have converted archive-derived data into electronic format to facilitate the storage, querying and presentation of the material. In some cases, these electronic databases have been made available online. However, as biographical databases have proliferated on the web, problems have emerged, many of them linked to the type of technology used by historians. Most history databases are implemented using unsophisticated tools like Microsoft Access. While these systems are adequate as data-storage facilities they impose certain limitations. In particular, they oblige historians to shoehorn historical data into pre-existing categories that are not custom built for the material in question. Nor do they easily accommodate variation in the density of information between individual records. This results in the generation of unfilled ‘white space’ so that database size and inflexibility increase even though many of the records remain sparsely populated. While commercially produced databases have query facilities these become more difficult to operate as the individual database becomes more complex. Merging is also problematic.
数据库和XML解决方案的问题
传记资料数据库现在是历史研究的一个共同特点。许多历史学家将来源于档案的数据转换成电子格式,以方便材料的存储、查询和展示。在某些情况下,这些电子数据库已联机提供。然而,随着传记数据库在网络上的激增,问题也出现了,其中许多问题与历史学家使用的技术类型有关。大多数历史数据库都是使用Microsoft Access等简单的工具实现的。虽然这些系统作为数据存储设施是足够的,但它们有一定的局限性。特别是,它们迫使历史学家将历史数据硬塞进预先存在的类别中,而这些类别并不是为相关材料定制的。它们也不容易适应各个记录之间信息密度的变化。这将导致产生未填充的“空白空间”,因此即使许多记录仍然是稀疏的,数据库的大小和灵活性也会增加。虽然商业生产的数据库具有查询功能,但随着单个数据库变得更加复杂,这些功能变得更加难以操作。合并也有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivium Hibernicum
Archivium Hibernicum Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信